Blogging through Wikipedia (2023)

Advantages of using Wikipedia: Broader information: Wikipedia has almost every type of information you need to find. Wiki pages contain information on different topics Ease of use: it is easy to find the information you are looking for in a few minutes. You can also easily learn about new things you've never heard of before. User collaboration: Users in different parts of the world can open the same document at the same time, making collaboration on shared data easier. Editing by everyone: Anyone registered with Wikipedia can edit information published on a Wikipedia page. Steps must be taken to ensure that only logged-in people can edit documents and have access. Information Control: Every edit or update of wiki information is recorded in the wiki software. If the wrong information is edited, the software can easily revert the changes to the previous version. Flexible: The program has no predetermined structure and can be used for a variety of applications. Instant content: Inform...

If you try to create a Wikipedia page (build a Wikipedia page) and it gets rejected, there are a few things to consider carefully before resubmitting: 1. The most common reason for Wikipedia pages not to be reviewed is lack of popularity. You tried the first word, and the Wikipedia and Wikipedia page you submitted were rejected, so don't continue to submit unless you can improve the page and its source immediately. How to increase popularity? Here are two ways to improve: a. Strengthen your PR strategy. Being remembered in major publications is one of the most challenging marketing tasks for a business. Your options and opportunities will largely depend on your industry, often determined by a combination of: great product, industry disruption, employer brand and CSR activities, link-worthy content, well-known employees and brand ambassadors, Actively monitor public opinion and seek news opportunities.Also, it's worth noting that not all media coverage is fair. b. Try Wikipedia ...

What is the difference between Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia for creating entries? China's domestic encyclopedia platform Baidu Baike dominates, but internationally Wikipedia dominates, even in the field of Chinese encyclopedias Wikipedia also has a place. So, what is the difference between building Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia? Although Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia are both encyclopedia platforms, their collection rules and editing skills are quite different. First, Baidu Encyclopedia is a system review, while Wikipedia is a manual review. Manual review is seriously affected by personal cognition and will be stricter. Second, Baidu Encyclopedia generally does not delete entries unless there are major problems. However, it is relatively common to delete entries from Wikipedia, so editing Wikipedia must be rigorous enough, and a little negligence may lead to the deletion of entries. Third, Baidu Encyclopedia is to build entries and gradually increase content in actual com...

Wikipedia is a free, multilingual online encyclopedia overseen by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation. The platform consists of millions of entries, written and maintained by a community of volunteers through an open collaborative model. Pages are linked to each other to create a network of accessible and current information on a variety of topics. Wikipedia states and emphasizes that it is not a medium of propaganda, and that all articles are written from a neutral perspective, which is usually achieved through continuous updating. Editors, known as Wikipedians, anonymously contribute material to the platform, much like open source encyclopedia entries. With a single click of Edit, editors can perform tasks ranging from correcting typos to eliminating vandalism, resolving disputes, and continually updating and refining content. Three Steps to Realizing Existence on Wikipedia A Wikipedia page can help your brand achieve online visibility, increase credibility and communicate important b...

Wikipedia is an excellent place where we can document our expertise and create fact-based touchpoints for our interests. The site's mission is altruistic, Wikipedia administrators guard against content with an obvious purpose, and conscious propaganda is easily punished. There are certain strategies we can employ to increase the chances of an entry meeting Wikipedia standards. Share four points for attention: 1. Is the topic compelling and relevant? Wikipedia defines "notability" as having "garnered widespread worldwide attention" and can be verified by "reliable third-party sources". This is done by examining the extent to which the topic is covered in the media and various publications. Checking out a topic can be as simple as typing it into a search engine and looking for mentions in current news and books. However, there are many topics missing from mainstream media or books, such as places and even historical landmarks. In such cases, census websi...

  Experience of editing WIKI entries Select the entry to be edited to see if it is created, and if it is created, edit and improve it; if not to create, just edit, first find the entry you want to modify, and find the relevant entry that can eventually be added to the website link Editing, supplementing, modifying, and adjusting the content and form of the entire entry, or deleting repetitive and cumbersome content, as well as bolding, italicizing, setting it as a link or paragraph title, and inserting special symbols, etc. operate. Finally, fill in the reason for modifying this entry, such as adding internal links, adding content, deleting duplicates, correcting errors, adding pictures, etc., to give an accurate and comprehensive overview of the reasons for modifying this entry, and to help administrators speed up the entry of words article review. 1. Creation of entries: Before creating entries, find relevant information on the Internet or in books. The content extracted from the...

  (1) Summary   Wikipedia is a free, free and open encyclopedia collaboration program involving participants from all over the world.Wikipedia itself has three striking features that distinguish it from traditional encyclopedias. First, Wikipedia has always positioned itself as an encyclopedia of all areas of human knowledge, not a dictionary, an online forum, or anything else.Second, Wikipedia was the first collaborative program to use the Wiki system to compile encyclopedias, allowing broad public participation.Another important feature is that Wikipedia is an open-ended encyclopedia.Materials with open content allow any third party to reproduce, modify and reprint any or all parts of the materials without restriction. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia created by many people.In traditional encyclopedias, the average person can only be a reader, but in Wikipedia, we can be both readers and authors.Anyone can modify, annotate, dispute, vote on an article… In short, Wiki...

My first edit was in April 2020, then I started trying to edit more entries, then I started creating entries and even translating English Wikipedia into Chinese Wikipedia.Wikipedia is one of my most visited sites. I visit Wikipedia every day to see what I care about, write about unfinished editing plans, and see little by little perfection.In the last three years of wiki editing, I've learned a lot: first of all, I can understand various fields of knowledge.By writing on Wikipedia, I have expanded my knowledge and corrected many misconceptions.Second, I became familiar with the encyclopedia model.Each type of entry has its own pattern, and the brain has a basic framework for creating new entries over time.These patterns are not limited to Wikipedia, but are also useful for other writing platforms. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, and a neutral view is one of Wikipedia's five pillars and one of its three core approaches to content.Most of its content is written in a neutral ...

  (1) Summary  Page classification helps users search Wikipedia by classification. Page classification is used to highlight the characteristics of things described in an entry.Pages are categorized, neutral, and follow established rules. Wikipedia has the ability to search by class.For example, if we want to know what sub-disciplines exist under the "physics" category, type "Category: Physics" to get a list of sub-disciplines of physics, such as "classical mechanics," "quantum physics," and "theoretical physics."With this classification, all entries in Wikipedia can be categorized into categories, and Wikipedia displays all categories to which the entry belongs at the bottom of each entry page.Newton, for example, is classified as "British physicist," "Lucas Professor of Mathematics," "Research Fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge," "History of Calculus," and even "The Man Who Died in 1727.We...

(1) Summary  Many categories of these pages can let us understand how to grow in Wikipedia.This page describes all stages of life and lists the methods we can help the article grow into the next stage.  The DYK section showcases new or expanded articles that are selected through an informal review process.   （2）Interesting point  DYK is not: A smaller-scale version of either featured content or good articles, though selected good articles do appear in the DYK box. Articles must meet the basic criteria set out on this page but do not have to be of very high quality. As DYK's main purpose is to showcase new and improved content, it is not expected that articles appearing on DYK would be considered among the best on Wikipedia. (3)Discussion After understanding these contents, what do you think the most important point of the article is?

 (1) Summary  Wikimedia Commons is an online repository of free-use images, sound and other media files. It is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. Files from Wikimedia Commons can be used across all Wikimedia projects in all languages, including Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, and Wikinews, or downloaded for offsite use. The repository contains over 12 million media files. （2）Interesting point  There are many types of questions here, and you can learn the answers and the right things to do or help.One question, for example, is: Can I upload scans and images of other people I've modified? The corresponding answer below is that only the producer of the original work, or those authorized to license the work, may license the work.If there are certain licenses for such works, then you can. You can also see more detailed instructions in addition to this information. (3)Discussion Is there anything else you want to ask or wonder about besides the questions on the page?...

     (1) Summary  This is a cultural phenomenon in which people combine, edit, and deconstruct like a mix to create a new work or product based on an original creation, which is called "secondary creation" or "re-creation. In fact, every netizen—that is, us—can be counted as creators.In fact, this creative culture is so wide that any form of participation can be regarded as secondary creation, which, because it retains many of the original settings or images, relies heavily on the cultural background and context. （2）Interesting point  We just stare at the mobile phone, look around, come across something that is suitable for imitation and transformation (called "stemmed" in Internet parlance), take it, make it into a catchphrase/short video/emoticon package and put it back on the Internet. Then they no longer belong to us, but are discovered by the next person, and the third and fourth creations are made, and finally form the "pop culture" we see now, ...

   (1) Summary  Free-culture movement(自由文化运动)：The free-culture movement is a social movement that promotes the freedom to distribute and modify creative works in the form of free content by using the Internet and other forms of media. （2）Interesting point  The free culture that knowledge sharing represents is also a culture.Culture, conceptually, is an organic whole.Society grows and develops in this culture, from one person to another.It is the interaction and exchange of ideas between people.Freedom culture is a special product of the modern world in which freedom is lacking. Artists need raw materials.Painters need paints, brushes, and canvas.Sculptors need clay and tools.Digital content editors need digital content, whether it's clip art or sound effects or ready-made genie in video games.Digital media gives people the power to do things that take a group of people to do.In fact, most of us are ambitious.We want to do big projects, and we want to achieve res...

 (1) Summary This is a known historical scam on Wikipedia, and it exists to document scams on Wikipedia to improve our ability to detect scams. If a hoax has not been found factually false for more than a month, or has been reported in authoritative media, Wikipedia considers it noteworthy enough to be included in this list. Some edited entries are pollution of a large amount of real and credible information, and are also a blow to the credibility of the platform. Just looking around the world, there are quite a few similar things. As far as the information on Wikipedia's hoax list is concerned, there are countless fictional characters, places, tools, TV shows, and academic concepts. （2）Interesting point  In 2012, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published a new Apple patent called "Electronic Analysis of Pollution Technology." The emergence of this technology is mainly due to the consideration of protecting user information. Brands can confuse and protect real inform...

   (1) Summary Since its inception, Wikipedia has been shunned almost unanimously by academia, almost unanimously, that is, not to be used in academic research or writing. First, the accuracy is poor.The accuracy of such information cannot be guaranteed, given that it can be written and edited by everyone and that such acts can take place anytime, anywhere.While everyone can write, edit, and make sure to change mistakes at any time, some of them have been there for a long time, not just months or even years.For more abstract topics, fewer people read and fewer articles edited, the probability of this error is higher.Second, its credibility is low.According to a 2009 survey, more than 87% of Wikipedia's editors are male and under the age of 27, with the majority coming from Europe and North America.Because of the lack of diversity, the content not only does not fully reflect the diversity of human knowledge, but also correspondingly lacks a diversity of views, even with di...

 (1) Summary The Wikipedia community casts Wikipedia. They are the builders, souls, and masters of Wikipedia. They are willing to spend a long time writing every entry, checking every change, and helping every new editor on Wikipedia. When Jimmy Wales Cye created this website, he certainly didn't expect that when he go online every day，a bunch of online administrators from every country told him what the status of Wikipedia's server is like. Every year, people are willing to donate their income to Wikipedia to support the operation of this website. What is it that makes them gather in a website that doesn't get any points, titles, benefits? Treat them like 「participants」, not 「consumers」.  Wikipedia is clear about its philosophy and essential purpose, and ensures that its words and deeds are sincerely in line with this philosophy. What makes a product powerful is not its size and strength, but its culture, a solid value and belief, and  This kind of thing g...

     (1) Summary The success of Wikipedia is the most famous example of many wiki phenomena.  "Wiki" allows logged-in users to modify their pages.  For Wikipedia, anyone can participate in editing.  The word "Wiki" means "quickly" in Hawaiian, and it also means "I know . . . ".  "Wiki" has thus become the purest form of participatory creativity and intelligence sharing, and David Weinberger is writing a book on collective intelligence, which he calls "the socialization of expertise." In new media, "wiki" and blog form the perfect complement.  Whereas blogs record unadorned and completely personal opinions, wikis directly and unequivocally allow a group of people to form a unified point of view.  The wiki's strength is in summarizing debates, but it's not for extreme opinions. In "wikis," Wikipedia's size sets it apart.  According to Joe Kraus, co-founder and CEO of the well-known JotSpot company...

   (1) Summary 1 . To pay attention to the Wikipedia editor rules. Although everyone can edit, but most of the theme of the entry of or by one or two editors.Other the editor was corrected a clerical error or something.So in reading attention should be concerned about the references too, when a combination of the two more easy to obtain a complete understanding of content. 2 . Wikipedia content is concise. The content of Wikipedia is concise and to the point. Generally speaking, the creation of Wikipedia entries does not exceed one screen and can only be used as a reference.  Because of such an entry, the editor probably wrote it simply based on his own understanding, and the quality is difficult to guarantee. 3 . View entry history. Click "View History" in the upper right corner.  Especially when looking at articles related to politics.  If there is a major modification recently, even after the modification is revoked (or called rollback), and anti-revoke,...

     (1) Summary The wiki model is a multi-person collaborative knowledge production model.It's a community of writers in the form of wiki, where everyone can browse, create, and change text, and it's a community-oriented collaborative writing (multi-creative).It is this "equality, freedom, participation, sharing and interaction" character that has attracted increasing attention. Wiki, which first appeared in the United States, is actually a new technology, a hypertext system.Simply put, the wiki system is a platform for everyone to write or create together.On this platform, collective wisdom can be concentrated for collective writing, collective creation, the realization of collective hypertext book writing.On a wiki page, everyone can browse, create, and change text, meaning everyone can easily write, modify, expand, or explore a common topic.The creators of the same Web site naturally form a community, and the Wiki system provides a simple communication tool for t...

   (1) Summary In my reading, I felt the "freedom", "cooperation" and "interaction" on Wikipedia.Wikipedia is a free and open community where you can contribute and communicate, where you can find the information you want or create a new entry for yourself. （2）Interesting point  It is mentioned that, according to recent research, Wikipedia's coverage of general knowledge and technology issues is quite good, but it also has blind spots in other areas of expertise.Users seem to be most interested in people because articles about humans (e.g., biography, culture, entertainment, self and sex) are the largest categories of content and the most visited by readers. Does this mean that Wikipedia, while comprehensive, is more humanistic in content and less editorial in other areas? In fact, it can be found. People read books and film and television works according to their personal preferences, but when searching for information and watching news, most of them ...