Reading 3-CAI XIAOHUA

   (1) Summary

The wiki model is a multi-person collaborative knowledge production model.It's a community of writers in the form of wiki, where everyone can browse, create, and change text, and it's a community-oriented collaborative writing (multi-creative).It is this "equality, freedom, participation, sharing and interaction" character that has attracted increasing attention.

Wiki, which first appeared in the United States, is actually a new technology, a hypertext system.Simply put, the wiki system is a platform for everyone to write or create together.On this platform, collective wisdom can be concentrated for collective writing, collective creation, the realization of collective hypertext book writing.On a wiki page, everyone can browse, create, and change text, meaning everyone can easily write, modify, expand, or explore a common topic.The creators of the same Web site naturally form a community, and the Wiki system provides a simple communication tool for the community.This is a high-tech collection of firewood, and participation or contribution is particularly important here.And the Internet's original spirit empowers Wikimedia: free, free, shared, trusted.I believe that with the continuous growth of Wiki, the value of knowledge sharing will be the greatest embodiment.


（2）Interesting point 

The multi-person collaborative knowledge production model has changed the old rules of "experts" writing. Ordinary users can become encyclopedic writers and change the way toolbooks are produced."No matter how rich a person's knowledge is, there is always one-sidedness and limitation, and only by bringing what people know together can he finally find the truth," says Wikipedia founder David Wales.Wikipedia's vision is to create a network of knowledge that everyone can write and share for free, providing everyone with all the knowledge created by human beings in their native language.Wikipedia has a clear advantage.

Multi-person collaborative knowledge production model is neutral and open.Since it is a collaborative project among web users, different perspectives on each topic will be found among many participants and readers in the development process.To avoid endless editorial warfare, the multi-person collaborative knowledge production model encourages each viewpoint to be expressed fairly, rather than arguing that any viewpoint is correct in writing.To write from a neutral point of view is to express a just point of view rather than to say what is true.

The proverb "The fire is high when all gather firewood" illustrates the powerful function of collective cooperation.One of the advantages of the multi-person collaborative knowledge production model is that it provides a platform for all to participate in. It provides a solid foundation for writing and publishing.


(3)Discussion

Everyone can be an editor and contributor.So do you agree with the way we work together（collaborative culture）?

Comments

  1. YE SIQIMarch 23, 2023 at 6:31 AM

    I agree.The multi person collaborative knowledge production model is a brand new knowledge production model. Through the collaborative action of network users, high-quality and large-capacity information can be produced in a relatively short time, which is unparalleled in the traditional knowledge production model of personal creation, publishing, and distribution.Wikipedia adopts a collaborative approach and generates a large amount of knowledge content. This collaborative approach can centralize collective wisdom for collective writing, collective creation, and achieve collective hypertext writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more