Blogging through Wikipedia (2023)

I was able to learn a lot while editing Wikipedia this semester. First and foremost is collaboration and teamwork. Wikipedia is a collaborative platform where many users participate in editing and improving articles. By editing Wikipedia, I was able to learn how to collaborate and work together with other users, share opinions, and engage in collaborative editing. Through experiences such as coordinating opinions with others, discussing edits, and receiving feedback, I acquired effective collaboration and communication skills. Next, I learned about document writing and editing. Document writing and editing are at the core of Wikipedia. By contributing to Wikipedia, I learned effective document writing techniques and editing practices. Through tasks like structuring documents, applying formatting, creating links, and managing references, I learned how to organize information systematically and present it in a way that is easy for users to read and understand. Lastly, I ga...

[Summary]       Did you know (DYK) is a project that showcases newly created or expanded articles on Wikipedia. It provides a platform to highlight interesting and noteworthy content to a wider audience. The DYK process involves nominating articles that meet certain criteria, such as being newly created or significantly expanded within a specific timeframe. Nominated articles undergo a review process to ensure they meet the project's standards and guidelines. Approved articles are then featured on the main page of Wikipedia for a limited time.       The DYK section includes a hook, which is a brief and attention-grabbing statement about the article's subject. These hooks aim to pique readers' interest and encourage them to click on the link to learn more. The DYK project helps to promote engagement and collaboration among Wikipedia editors and encourages the creation of high-quality content. It also serves as a means of recognizing and celebrating the ...

[Summary]      Categorization is a guideline that provides guidance on how to effectively categorize articles on Wikipedia. Categorization is the process of organizing articles into categories based on their subject matter. The guideline emphasizes the importance of using existing categories and avoiding the creation of unnecessary or redundant categories. It encourages editors to categorize articles based on their notable aspects and relevance, while also considering the potential for future growth and changes in categorization.       The guideline recommends the use of specific, precise, and meaningful category names, and discourages the use of vague or ambiguous ones. It also advises against over-categorization, which involves placing articles in too many categories, as it can make navigation and maintenance difficult. The guideline encourages the use of category hierarchies to create a structured organization of articles within a broader subject ar...

[Summary]      Wikipedia:Article development is a guideline designed to help editors improve and expand articles on Wikipedia. The guideline encourages editors to focus on adding high-quality, reliable sources to articles, as well as improving the writing and structure of the content. One key aspect of the guideline is the concept of "stub" articles, which are short, incomplete articles that need to be expanded. The guideline provides advice on how to identify and expand stub articles, as well as how to avoid creating new stub articles. Editors are encouraged to use reliable sources, such as books, academic journals, and news outlets, to improve the accuracy and depth of articles.      The guideline also recommends that editors use a neutral point of view and avoid bias when writing articles. Other topics covered in the guideline include creating outlines and summaries, organizing information into sections, and formatting content....

[Summary]       Wikimedia Commons is a repository of free-use images, sounds, and other media files. Anyone can contribute to Wikimedia Commons and use the content for any purpose, even commercial ones, as long as they attribute the original creator. All content on Wikimedia Commons is released under a Creative Commons license or is in the public domain. Uploading copyrighted content without permission is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The Wikimedia Commons community can discuss and decide whether or not to delete content that does not meet the site's policies. The site has a system of categorization and tagging to help users find the media they need. Wikimedia Commons also has a tool to help users find images that are missing from articles on Wikipedia. The site has a detailed FAQ section that provides answers to common questions and issues related to using and contributing to Wikimedia Commons. [Interesting point]      One interesting point about Wikim...

  [Summary]       Remix culture refers to the practice of recombining and modifying existing cultural works to create new ones. This practice is facilitated by digital technologies such as sampling, copying, and editing, which have made it easier to manipulate and distribute creative works. Remix culture can be seen in a wide range of fields, from music and film to art, literature, and software. Advocates of remix culture argue that it promotes creativity, innovation, and the democratization of culture by making it more accessible and participatory. However, there are also concerns about copyright infringement, plagiarism, and the ethical implications of appropriating other people's work without permission. Some artists and creators embrace remix culture and actively encourage others to use their work as raw material, while others view it as a threat to their intellectual property rights and creative autonomy. The legal status of remix culture varies by jurisdiction,...

[Summary]        The List of hoaxes on Wikipedia is a collection of instances where Wikipedia articles were created or edited with false or misleading information, often as a prank or as a deliberate attempt to deceive readers. The hoaxes range from minor errors to elaborate and widespread campaigns, and they can have serious consequences for the credibility of Wikipedia and the spread of misinformation. Some hoaxes were quickly discovered and corrected, while others remained on Wikipedia for months or even years before being exposed. Wikipedia has implemented various measures to prevent hoaxes and to detect and remove them, including automated bots, community monitoring, and stricter verification requirements for new articles. However, hoaxes continue to be a challenge for Wikipedia and a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and fact-checking in online research. [Interesting point] One interesting point is the measures that Wikipedia has implemented ...

[Summary] Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that allows anyone to edit its articles. The reliability of Wikipedia has been a subject of debate since its inception. While Wikipedia has strict guidelines for editing and citing sources, errors and biases can still occur. Various studies have shown that the accuracy of Wikipedia articles is generally high, but there are also concerns about vandalism, deliberate misinformation, and systemic biases in the editorial process. To address these concerns, Wikipedia has implemented measures such as flagging controversial articles and restricting editing permissions for certain pages. Despite these efforts, the reliability of Wikipedia remains a matter of ongoing discussion and scrutiny. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to ensure the accuracy and verifiability of its content. Reliable sources are those that have a reputation for accuracy and have been peer-reviewed, edited, or fact-checked by experts in the relevant field. Prima...

Good Faith Collaboration [Interesting point]      One interesting point about the Good Faith Collaboration (GFC) is its focus on creating a collaborative environment between programmers, which is somewhat different from traditional approaches to software development. Rather than having a single, central authority figure in charge of a project, GFC emphasizes mutual trust and cooperation among all participants. This means that everyone involved is encouraged to contribute their ideas and expertise, and the group works together to refine and improve each other's contributions.      Overall, GFC represents a novel and innovative approach to software development that champions the importance of collaboration and mutual trust among contributors. It has proven successful in various projects, and its principles have served as inspiration for rethinking how we can work together to create high-quality software. [Discussion angle]       One potential c...

   [Summary}      This article discusses how reference works can be intertwined with social and political debates, as demonstrated in the controversy surrounding the publication of Webster's Third dictionary. The author then looks at how Wikipedia is entangled in a similar debate today, with questions about the effectiveness of collaborative content production, the feasibility of a universal encyclopedia, and the impact of technology on knowledge construction. The discussion also considers the encyclopedic impulse and bibliophilic passion that drive both supporters and critics of Wikipedia, as well as the importance of developing critical judgment when evaluating information. Ultimately, the author argues for a reasoned middle ground, where Wikipedia can be used not only as a reference work, but also as a study of how knowledge is constructed and contested.      And next article discusses the Wikipedia community's approach to achieving consensus a...

  [Summary}      This passage discusses the challenges of consensus in the context of the Wikipedia community. Despite its reliance on good faith and consensus decision-making, Wikipedia remains relatively tolerant of the ambiguities inherent in collaborating on a global encyclopedia. The lack of topical and temporal scope, initial lack of facilitation, turnover in membership, and anonymity all contribute to the challenges of consensus practice. The passage highlights several humorous examples of the difficulties of consensus, including a WikiSpeak definition and a tongue-in-cheek answer to the question of how many Wikipedians it takes to change a light bulb. The author acknowledges that Wikipedia has not become the global institution of "adjustment and adjudication" that Wells foresaw but is a fascinating example of community decision-making in a new context. Despite its challenges, Wikipedia is an open content community that trusts in human judgment over the long r...

  [Summary]      The chapter "Conflict and Consensus in an Open Source Community" from Joseph Reagle's book "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia" explores the selection process for Wikipedia's "featured articles" and the tensions that arise between consensus and expertise in this process. Reagle uses ethnographic research methods to examine how the community navigates these tensions and the role of power and authority in the decision-making process. He finds that there is often conflict between community members who prioritize consensus and those who prioritize expertise, and that more experienced or knowledgeable members often have more influence in the selection process. However, the community values transparency and accountability, and decisions are typically made through public discussion and debate. Reagle's chapter sheds light on the challenges of collaborative decision-making in open-source communities and the need for bal...

[Summary]        The global financial crisis of 2008 was caused by multiple factors, including the rise and fall of the subprime mortgage market and the monopolistic behavior of financial companies. These issues were a result of the interaction between the government and the market, with major financial companies disrupting the principles of a free market and the absence of regulation.      The chapter argues that increasing the transparency of financial markets and strengthening regulations is crucial to prevent future financial crises. While the management policies and regulations of financial institutions have contributed to the competitiveness and profitability of the financial market, this competitive environment can also increase its instability.      Financial companies pursue profits through loans and other means, which sometimes result in the creation of risky financial products or the purchase of bad debt for their own benefit....

[Summary]     Wikipedia, a product of collective intelligence, could not have been predicted to achieve what it is 10 years ago. Currently, Wikipedia has become a prominent website around the world and is recognized in a variety of different ways. This is the result of collective intelligence created by people gathered entirely based on their love for work. Now we have to go through Wikipedia whatever anyone wants to know.      Wikipedia is a community, but it's a community formed through  practice  or collaboration.' Working at Wikipedia means working together to produce the social goods that countless people around the world depend on. The author describes this aspect as "a world in which all humans are free to share the sum of their hair root instructions."      In order to create a dictionary for everyone, many academic fields such as economics, politics, history, and even law are needed. But Wikipedia is not looking for perfect...