Reading11(Minji Jeong)

[Summary]

     Wikipedia:Article development is a guideline designed to help editors improve and expand articles on Wikipedia. The guideline encourages editors to focus on adding high-quality, reliable sources to articles, as well as improving the writing and structure of the content. One key aspect of the guideline is the concept of "stub" articles, which are short, incomplete articles that need to be expanded. The guideline provides advice on how to identify and expand stub articles, as well as how to avoid creating new stub articles. Editors are encouraged to use reliable sources, such as books, academic journals, and news outlets, to improve the accuracy and depth of articles.

     The guideline also recommends that editors use a neutral point of view and avoid bias when writing articles. Other topics covered in the guideline include creating outlines and summaries, organizing information into sections, and formatting content. Editors are encouraged to collaborate and seek feedback from other editors when working on articles. The guideline emphasizes the importance of creating articles that are accessible and easy to read, particularly for a general audience. The use of images and other media is also discussed, with guidance on how to add them in a way that supports the article's content. The guideline provides advice on how to handle controversial topics or topics that may be subject to bias or misinformation.

     Editors are encouraged to stay up-to-date with new information and research related to the topic of their articles. The guideline also covers the use of templates and infoboxes to provide additional information and context to articles. The guideline encourages editors to continuously improve and expand articles, rather than considering them "finished." The ultimate goal of the guideline is to create informative, high-quality articles that are useful to readers and reflect the best available information on a given topic.



[Interesting point]

     Article development guideline is its emphasis on collaboration and seeking feedback from other editors. Wikipedia is a community-driven platform where anyone can contribute to articles, and this guideline recognizes the importance of working together to improve the quality of articles. By seeking feedback and collaborating with other editors, individuals can benefit from diverse perspectives and expertise, leading to more comprehensive and accurate articles. This collaborative approach also promotes a sense of community and shared responsibility for creating high-quality content on Wikipedia.



[Discussion angle]


     Article development guideline could be the challenge of balancing the need for accuracy and reliability with the desire to create engaging and accessible articles. While it is important to use reliable sources and maintain a neutral point of view, some topics may require more creativity and storytelling to make them engaging for readers. How can editors strike a balance between these two priorities?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more