Summary of reading material 1----HE YUNONG (3.10)

 Summary of reading material 1

--HE YUNONG (하우농)


1. Summary

After reading these articles, I learned more about Wikipedia. As mentioned in the article, no one would have imagined that Wikipedia could become the top website today. Before I took the course taught, I was also a person who had only heard of wiki but could not use or understand what Wikipedia was, including wiki voyage, wiki data, etc. Because I have never been taught, I am very grateful to the professor for letting me know about wiki and joining wiki.

I understand that the core of wiki is a collaborative community, where many volunteers freely and voluntarily share their knowledge; Children as young as seven or eight years old and elderly people can become volunteers in wiki. One of the characteristics of wiki is that it is free and unpaid, so all wiki people don't work on wiki for money, but to love and help others. Wiki can develop into such a top-level website today without the efforts of these volunteers, and I think it needs more volunteers to make it better.


2. Interesting points

I like the sentence in the article: "It is valuable to study anything that was once thought impossible but later proved feasible", because I think this behavior is great and challenging. Just like wiki, it has proved its strength to everyone and been recognized by everyone, but of course it does not exclude some people who don't recognize wiki. So I think we should stick to what we think is right and prove it to others, just like this sentence, even though it is not valued by others and cannot be easily given up.


3. Discussion points

Because wiki is a website that anyone can edit, some arguments are inevitable. What should we do when two or more parties to the argument make sense?


Comments

  1. 이서윤(Seoyoon Lee)March 10, 2023 at 2:28 AM

    I think that if more than one argument is valid, all arguments should be described. Representatively, it will be possible to talk about advocacy and criticism of a specific policy. A policy that everyone agrees on is rare. Therefore, when describing a policy, I think both advocacy and criticism should be described through sub-classification.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 채효화March 13, 2023 at 8:20 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 채효화March 13, 2023 at 8:22 AM

    I think the final position should be neutral, objective and unbiased impersonal.

    ReplyDelete
  4. YE SIQIMarch 14, 2023 at 6:18 AM

    I think we should maintain an objective attitude when we argue.First listen to the descriptions of both sides, understand the views of both sides, and then analyse and resolve the dispute in an objective and neutral manner.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading2：LI XINWEI

  1)  Summary    Wikipedia has a long history of development and it didn't happen overnight. Wikipedia couldn't have developed without all the people who had ideas to benefit the world. Wikipedia is free and does not exist for profit. As the internet grew and became more widely used, people began to plan and build interpedia. The "sum of all human knowledge" is the ultimate goal of Wikipedia, and the World Encyclopedia is the repository of knowledge to which all humanity aspires. The "necessary conditions" for the emergence of Wikipedia 2) Interesting point   “To collect all the knowledge now scattered over the surface of the earth, to make its general structure known to those around us, and to spread it to those who come after us.”   Regardless of their wealth, social status or academic background, people have the opportunity to participate in the editing of Wikipedia, sharing their experiences or knowledge to all people through this Wikipedia that covers t
Read more

Reading 14: ZENG WANTING

  1） Summarize of metirals Wikipedia has millions of editors, the population is larger than many counties. If we know about wikipedia cultures, we can know a new, complex, virtual culture can arise within barely a decade and it will improve our skills at editng wikipedia, reducing tensions and imrovinh ours familiarity with the project. When we editing the article of the wikipedia, we are contacting with other people we are not working alone. Wikipedia is a community, people work together and have communications with others. Wikipedia culture is significant enough th have impact on th real world. Wikipedia values related to th efree culture movement have influrenced legislation in the USA and elsewhere. Overall, Wikipedia's vibrant culture and the dedication of its community have played a significant role in creating a vast and reliable knowledge resource available to people worldwide. 2） Something interseting I learned The wikipeidia uesrs are called as wikipedian by their languag
Read more