Reading 2-CAI XIAOHUA

  (1) Summary

In my reading, I felt the "freedom", "cooperation" and "interaction" on Wikipedia.Wikipedia is a free and open community where you can contribute and communicate, where you can find the information you want or create a new entry for yourself.

（2）Interesting point 

It is mentioned that, according to recent research, Wikipedia's coverage of general knowledge and technology issues is quite good, but it also has blind spots in other areas of expertise.Users seem to be most interested in people because articles about humans (e.g., biography, culture, entertainment, self and sex) are the largest categories of content and the most visited by readers. Does this mean that Wikipedia, while comprehensive, is more humanistic in content and less editorial in other areas? In fact, it can be found. People read books and film and television works according to their personal preferences, but when searching for information and watching news, most of them pay more attention to humanities and current affairs.Together with the impact of the Corona virus in recent years, most people now focus more on topics such as personal and social issues.


(3)Discussion

Have you paid attention to any areas of Wikipedia other than the humanities?Are there blind spots in areas like the ones mentioned?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more