Blogging through Wikipedia (2023)

Advantages of using Wikipedia: Broader information: Wikipedia has almost every type of information you need to find. Wiki pages contain information on different topics Ease of use: it is easy to find the information you are looking for in a few minutes. You can also easily learn about new things you've never heard of before. User collaboration: Users in different parts of the world can open the same document at the same time, making collaboration on shared data easier. Editing by everyone: Anyone registered with Wikipedia can edit information published on a Wikipedia page. Steps must be taken to ensure that only logged-in people can edit documents and have access. Information Control: Every edit or update of wiki information is recorded in the wiki software. If the wrong information is edited, the software can easily revert the changes to the previous version. Flexible: The program has no predetermined structure and can be used for a variety of applications. Instant content: Inform...

If you try to create a Wikipedia page (build a Wikipedia page) and it gets rejected, there are a few things to consider carefully before resubmitting: 1. The most common reason for Wikipedia pages not to be reviewed is lack of popularity. You tried the first word, and the Wikipedia and Wikipedia page you submitted were rejected, so don't continue to submit unless you can improve the page and its source immediately. How to increase popularity? Here are two ways to improve: a. Strengthen your PR strategy. Being remembered in major publications is one of the most challenging marketing tasks for a business. Your options and opportunities will largely depend on your industry, often determined by a combination of: great product, industry disruption, employer brand and CSR activities, link-worthy content, well-known employees and brand ambassadors, Actively monitor public opinion and seek news opportunities.Also, it's worth noting that not all media coverage is fair. b. Try Wikipedia ...

What is the difference between Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia for creating entries? China's domestic encyclopedia platform Baidu Baike dominates, but internationally Wikipedia dominates, even in the field of Chinese encyclopedias Wikipedia also has a place. So, what is the difference between building Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia? Although Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia are both encyclopedia platforms, their collection rules and editing skills are quite different. First, Baidu Encyclopedia is a system review, while Wikipedia is a manual review. Manual review is seriously affected by personal cognition and will be stricter. Second, Baidu Encyclopedia generally does not delete entries unless there are major problems. However, it is relatively common to delete entries from Wikipedia, so editing Wikipedia must be rigorous enough, and a little negligence may lead to the deletion of entries. Third, Baidu Encyclopedia is to build entries and gradually increase content in actual com...

Wikipedia is a free, multilingual online encyclopedia overseen by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation. The platform consists of millions of entries, written and maintained by a community of volunteers through an open collaborative model. Pages are linked to each other to create a network of accessible and current information on a variety of topics. Wikipedia states and emphasizes that it is not a medium of propaganda, and that all articles are written from a neutral perspective, which is usually achieved through continuous updating. Editors, known as Wikipedians, anonymously contribute material to the platform, much like open source encyclopedia entries. With a single click of Edit, editors can perform tasks ranging from correcting typos to eliminating vandalism, resolving disputes, and continually updating and refining content. Three Steps to Realizing Existence on Wikipedia A Wikipedia page can help your brand achieve online visibility, increase credibility and communicate important b...

Wikipedia is an excellent place where we can document our expertise and create fact-based touchpoints for our interests. The site's mission is altruistic, Wikipedia administrators guard against content with an obvious purpose, and conscious propaganda is easily punished. There are certain strategies we can employ to increase the chances of an entry meeting Wikipedia standards. Share four points for attention: 1. Is the topic compelling and relevant? Wikipedia defines "notability" as having "garnered widespread worldwide attention" and can be verified by "reliable third-party sources". This is done by examining the extent to which the topic is covered in the media and various publications. Checking out a topic can be as simple as typing it into a search engine and looking for mentions in current news and books. However, there are many topics missing from mainstream media or books, such as places and even historical landmarks. In such cases, census websi...

  Experience of editing WIKI entries Select the entry to be edited to see if it is created, and if it is created, edit and improve it; if not to create, just edit, first find the entry you want to modify, and find the relevant entry that can eventually be added to the website link Editing, supplementing, modifying, and adjusting the content and form of the entire entry, or deleting repetitive and cumbersome content, as well as bolding, italicizing, setting it as a link or paragraph title, and inserting special symbols, etc. operate. Finally, fill in the reason for modifying this entry, such as adding internal links, adding content, deleting duplicates, correcting errors, adding pictures, etc., to give an accurate and comprehensive overview of the reasons for modifying this entry, and to help administrators speed up the entry of words article review. 1. Creation of entries: Before creating entries, find relevant information on the Internet or in books. The content extracted from the...

   1. Summary: A simple summary of the universal encyclopedic vision is its aspiration of expansiveness. Otlet’s “Universal Repertory” and Wells’ “World Brain” were conceived of as furthering an increased scope in production and access. Reference work compilers would be joined by world scholars and international technocrats. Furthermore, every student might have these extensive resources at hand, in a personal, inexpensive, and portable format. It was hoped this collection of intellect would yield a greater sense of mutual accord throughout the world. Nor would the world encyclopedia limit itself to text.  In the Interpedia days it was thought that reasonable and well-educated people might contribute — how most Internet users could conceive of themselves at the time. Nupedia, too, had the potential to open up contribution, even if it was still limited to the formally educated.  2. Interesting point: Wikipedia almost “anyone” can edit, something not even conceived of ...

   1. Summary: As is evident in my concern with Wikipedia culture in earlier chapters, I wrote that I agreed “with Jimbo that any posited explanation that fails to account for the dynamics and culture of good-willed interaction has got it wrong. So in that sense, Surowiecki is (perhaps) necessary but (certainly) not sufficient.”  Yet, despite an admittedly incomplete understanding and Wales’s public attempts to disclaim Wikipedia as a “hive-mind,” the accusation continues to be raised. For example, in September 2006 an otherwise informative article entitled “The Hive: Can Thousands of Wikipedians Be Wrong?” appeared in the Atlantic Monthly . In addition to likening online collaboration to a hornet’s nest and termite infestation, Helprin made an even less favorable comparison: these interactions were like a “quick sexual encounter at a bacchanal with someone whose name you never know and face you will not remember, if, indeed, you have actually seen it.” The resulting work...

   1. Summary: In many conflicts misunderstandings are as common, if not more so, than genuine differences. There are elements to this in the arguments about Wikipedia, particularly over the way it is produced. Describing how knowledge is constituted can be difficult, but one can identify three ways for how we might think of knowledge production throughout history.  First, we must admit that the hermit’s encyclopedia, devoid of all contact with the words of others, would be of little use. Even the monastic scribe copying parchment, and introducing some changes no doubt, is engaged in some degree of sociality. Some have described this interaction at a distance, in time or geography, as a type of stigmergy, like a wasp building upon the work of others.  Second, the production of a reference work eventually exceeded the capability of any one person. What might be thought of as corporate production includes the interaction of financiers and subscribers, and of contributo...

Through this course, I learned to use Wikipedia to edit content. This course is just like its name: Collective Intelligence. Wikipedia is an open encyclopedia platform. I worked as a volunteer in it with many editors from different regions. Editing content, through learning in class, I learned a lot of Wikipedia editing tools. For example, inserting pictures, inserting panels, citing articles or books, etc., and finally combining these contents into a new article and publishing it on Wikipedia, giving I feel like I'm in a network with other editors who are connected to each other through the platform of Wikipedia. At the same time, through a semester of study, I read a lot of Wikipedia content written by other editors. Through the study of this argumentative essay, it played a positive role in the typesetting of my argumentative essay content. When I first edited Wikipedia, it was basically I have no way to start, and I have also gained in the arrangement of Wikipedia content by re...

 Summarize: Wikipedia's "Wikipedia: Did You Know" (DYK) section is a compelling feature that provides users with interesting or little-known information. It's called "DYK" and is one of the items on the Wikipedia home page. This section is intended to highlight and draw attention to new documents created by users or to modify certain content of documents. This is an acknowledgment of the contributions of the Wikipedia community and helps more users learn about new information. Users can submit DYK projects, which will be added to the queue after being approved by the community. This provides users with the opportunity to share and promote their contributions with others. The "Did you know" section of Wikipedia plays an important role in helping users explore and understand new topics and topics. Interesting point of view: The most interesting point is that Wikipedia first shows users specific articles. DYK Articles employs high-quality content and ...

 1. Summary: The categorization feature of Wikipedia is crucial for organizing and navigating its vast content. The category system aims to provide navigation links within the hierarchical structure of categories. By understanding the basic characteristics of a topic, readers can quickly locate a collection of pages defined by those characteristics. It is important to assign articles to specific and non-redundant categories, ensuring they align with the logical hierarchy. Categories should be verifiable, as the verification information within an article serves as the basis for categorization. Categories in Wikipedia resemble a tree structure, with links created between relevant categories, and more specific branches within each category. However, there can be issues with article categorization, such as insufficient or excessive categorization, or incorrect classification, which need to be addressed. 2. Interesting point: An interesting point is that if, for technical reasons, admin...

 1. Summary: The Wikimedia Commons category system provides guidelines for categorizing Wikipedia articles. Categories help classify articles and facilitate easy navigation for users. The guidelines emphasize maintaining a consistent category structure, meaningful grouping, avoiding overlapping categories, using specific names, and considering the scope and purpose of categories. They also suggest addressing issues related to article categorization, such as adding subcategories or separate categories when a single document covers multiple topics, and using automated tools for categorization and regular review to ensure category accuracy. In other words, the Wikimedia Commons category pages provide an effective method for editors to categorize articles. 2. Interesting point: It is interesting to note that naming conventions for categories are divided into general conventions and special conventions. General conventions include applying standard article naming conventions, deciding b...

1. Summary: Wikimedia Commons is a media repository for freely licensed images, sound, video, and other media files. It is a central hub for media resources used in various Wikimedia projects. Users are free to upload and access these media files, ensuring that they can be reused in any context without copyright restrictions. It provides users with a convenient and empowering source of media content. 2. An interesting point: An interesting aspect of Wikimedia Commons is that not all images in a Wikimedia project are automatically uploaded to Commons. This is because Commons has a stricter licensing policy than some other Wikimedia projects. Due to differences in licensing and fair use policies, some images that are not accepted on Commons may still be acceptable elsewhere. This highlights the importance of understanding and following the specific guidelines and principles of each platform in the Wikimedia ecosystem. 3 Discussion: One potential point of discussion could be about the imp...

Summarize: The Wikipedia taxonomy pages provide guidelines and suggestions for categorizing articles and helping users navigate related content. Editors can effectively categorize articles by maintaining a consistent taxonomic structure, meaningful groupings, limiting overlapping categories, using specific names, and considering the scope and purpose of categories. Using templates to create individual categories and using tree structures and images to represent category relationships can also add interest and visualization to categories. Interesting points: Categorizing articles and using templates to create individual categories are fun activities. At the same time, using a tree structure and images to represent the relationship between the upper and lower categories is helpful for understanding and organizing information. Questions discussed: When creating a category for a national institution's symbol, such as a flag, how should the category be chosen?

Summarize: The Free Culture Movement pursues the free flow of knowledge, information and culture, emphasizing the values of openness, freedom, sharing and cooperation. It promotes creativity, innovation and social development, and promotes the use of open licenses and open technology standards. The Free Culture Movement focuses on cultural diversity and inclusiveness, as well as reflections on the intellectual property system. While positive, there are trade-offs between interests and the legal framework. Interesting points: Features of the free culture movement include openness, freedom, knowledge sharing, and open technology standards. It emphasizes cultural diversity and inclusion, as well as collaborative creativity and the development of collective intelligence. This open approach helps foster innovation and technology interoperability. Discussion:  When editing Wikipedia, there must be subjective cognition, how to edit articles from an objective perspective as much as possibl...

 Summary: The first part of the text discusses the documentation and understanding of hoaxes on Wikipedia, emphasizing the purpose and definition of hoaxes as deliberate attempts to present false information as fact. It also highlights that while most scams on Wikipedia are short-lived, those that go undetected initially have a higher chance of lasting longer. The second part mentions that the list of hoaxes on Wikipedia is incomplete, indicating that many hoaxes remain undiscovered. It also compares successful hoaxes to legitimate articles in terms of traffic, article length, and links. Interesting Point: The text brings up the cultural significance of Wikipedia, noting that it is often imitated and referenced in popular culture. It mentions how Wikipedia is sometimes used as a character trait or game, and that having a Wikipedia entry can be seen as a status symbol. The example of Stephen Colbert coining the term "wikility" on his show highlights the integration of Wikipedi...

 Abstract: Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to ensure the accuracy and verifiability of its content. While platforms have taken some steps to maintain reliability, concerns about errors, bias and intentional misinformation remain. Wikipedia has implemented measures such as flagging controversial articles and restricting editorial access to certain pages. However, Wikipedia's reliability remains a matter of ongoing discussion and scrutiny. Interesting point: An interesting point is the emphasis on guidelines for using reliable sources and assessing their quality. This highlights the importance of critical thinking and fact-checking in online research, as even apparently credible sources can contain bias or misinformation. This emphasizes the need for users to be cautious and verify information from multiple reliable sources. Discussion: How to identify unreliable sources when using Wikipedia?

Summary: "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia" is a book by Joseph M. Reagle Jr. that explores the history, culture, and collaborative practices of Wikipedia. It provides insights into the development of Wikipedia, its success factors, and challenges. The book discusses the importance of consensus and collaboration within the Wikipedia community. After its publication, the book received mixed reviews, prompting further discussion and analysis. Interesting/Useful Points: One interesting aspect discussed in the book is the tension between individual viewpoints and collaborative projects. The chapters on "Nazis and Norms" and "Benevolent Dictators" delve into the challenges faced by online communities and the need for compromise and leadership. The book highlights the importance of maintaining freedom, respect, and fairness within the collaborative process. Another intriguing point is the exploration of the trade-off between freedom and progres...

 1. Summary: Wikipedia is an open platform that contains both true and accurate documentation as well as false documentation intended to deceive others. Some users deliberately create false information, causing operators to restrict editing permissions for new accounts. This deception persists and forms the "Wikipedia Scam List". Early detection of false documents is very important to the reliability of Wikipedia. 2. Interesting: An interesting point is that Wikipedia forms and files lists of fake documents, rather than just deleting them. Also, Stephen Colbert's concept of "wikiality" is interesting. He mocked Wikipedia users for believing in truth established through consensus rather than factual accuracy. This view is thought provoking because it holds that truth is true through consensus, not fact verification, which is an interesting counterpoint 3 Discussion: How to balance the fairness and security of Wikipedia?

 1) Summary: Wikipedia provides a wide range of information and knowledge for people to access and learn from. The goal of Wikipedia is to offer accurate, comprehensive, and neutral information so that readers can understand and explore various topics. Despite being collaboratively edited by volunteers, it remains an important reference tool. This is because the editing process on Wikipedia is open and transparent, allowing anyone to view the edit history of pages and track the sources of each change. Furthermore, many articles on Wikipedia undergo review and revisions by multiple editors to ensure their accuracy and objectivity. However, it's worth noting that the information on Wikipedia is not always entirely accurate or comprehensive. Therefore, when using Wikipedia as a reference tool, it is important to review and verify the information and seek other reliable sources to confirm its accuracy. It is best to use Wikipedia as a starting point for information rather than the fina...

 Summary: This article explores the advantages and disadvantages of the "openness" features of Wikipedia. The author discusses the five open characteristics: open content, transparency, integrity, nondiscrimination, and noninterference. They emphasize that open communities provide opportunities for learning, sharing, and innovation. However, the open environment also leads to controversies and disagreements, which pose challenges for maintaining a balanced and constructive community. Interesting point: Wikipedia has provided a platform for minorities and disadvantaged groups to freely discuss their identities, interests, and needs, allowing them to voice their opinions and challenge the mainstream. This inclusivity and openness are significant aspects of Wikipedia. Discussion: With regards to gender bias concerns, how can Wikipedia address the underrepresentation of women in authoritative positions and foster a more balanced and diverse contributor base?

  Summary: Wikipedia may have some security drawbacks due to its open editing nature, allowing anyone to participate. Interesting/Useful Point: The discussion on the popularity and reliability of Wikipedia is fascinating. Despite controversies regarding information reliability, Wikipedia, as a collaborative, accessible, and successful open content community, possesses significant power. Its rise and continuous development demonstrate people's desire to share and access knowledge, promoting global knowledge dissemination and collaboration. Discussion: How should we define the potential and direction of Wikipedia?

 Summary: Wikipedia is an online community where numerous volunteers collaborate to enrich and share knowledge. While the reliability of information is subject to debate, Wikipedia strives to improve accuracy through editing guidelines and community supervision. It serves as both an information platform and a social learning space, providing valuable opportunities for knowledge acquisition and sharing. Interesting Point: The ideal of Wikipedia was not to be built in a short period but rooted in the ideology of 20th-century internationalists like Wales. Furthermore, Wikipedia has been significantly influenced by previous technological projects, such as the implementation of hyperlinks and the concept of e-books, laying the foundation for its goal of becoming the "sum of all human knowledge." Discussion Point: The reliability of information in Wikipedia is a topic of discussion. The open nature of editing allows for the possibility of biased or intentionally misleading contribu...

  The class was very informative. On a site called Wikipedia, I was able to experience a culture of community collaboration, and I was able to see how influential my activities were. Wikipedia has quite a lot of influence. It is an open content community that anyone can edit, anyone can participate, and anyone can produce and share knowledge. It was a valuable class where I was able to learn, study, and experience sites with great influence around the world. I also experienced the power of 'collective intelligence' found in Wikipedia. It was most impressive that I learned about Wikipedia's 'reliability' and 'copyright' in class. Wikipedia is the place where the power of collective intelligence is greatly exercised, but when this collective intelligence is misrepresented, it knew that it could collapse in terms of reliability, and it could have been alert to be careful. We were also able to look at how important copyright is. And it was really beneficial to k...

  1. Summary Wikipedia has a common feature section called Did You Know (DYK). This section provides small but great knowledge points that capture readers' interest and encourage them to learn more about related topics. Promoting the dissemination and sharing of knowledge plays a role in helping readers explore and understand topics. Short and sophisticated knowledge in DYK can arouse readers' curiosity and interest. It also lures readers to Wikipedia, providing interesting clues. On the other hand, these DYKs are subject to certain quality controls to ensure accuracy and reliability. 2.Interesting The importance of hooks is emphasized in the DYK project. The project is listed on the Wikipedia main page, increasing editors' desire to edit documents. Just as we try to find only interesting things when we get to the news every day, there's a similar pattern of DYK in the community of Wikipedia. It was interesting that the word hook was used and used in these projects. 3. ...

 Baidu Encyclopedia is the dominant encyclopedia platform in China. But internationally, Wikipedia dominates. Although it is very inconvenient to access Wikipedia in the mainland, there are still many overseas people or Internet savvy people in China who access Wikipedia through technology. Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia are both encyclopedia platforms, but the rules of inclusion and editing skills are quite different. 1.Baidu encyclopedia is a system audit, Wikipedia is manual audit. Manual review is heavily influenced by personal cognition and can be more stringent. 2.Baidu Baike generally does not delete entries unless there is a major problem. However, Wikipedia deletion of articles is relatively common, so editing Wikipedia must be careful. A slight oversight could result in an entry being deleted. 3.Baidu encyclopedia actual combat is to establish entries gradually increase the content, can increase security. Wikipedia generally edits a full page of content and submits it t...

1.  Summary Wikipedia tells you how to use classification correctly. The central goal of the category function is to provide navigation links to Wikipedia pages. In particular, this allows Wikipedia users (readers) to know the essential characteristics of the content of the article in an article and quickly search and find pages about topics defined by those characteristics. After you define category features, detailed descriptions such as how to specify categories and naming conventions make Wikipedia easier to use. Categories are available for various media types, such as images and articles. For category functions, categories should be written specifically, rather than generating words with comprehensive big meanings. In addition, there is an alignment function to make it easier for people to receive information. These categories within Wikipedia can be specific, properly utilized, and created and modified by anyone. 2. Interesting/Useful Point Within Wikipedia, I find it useful...

1.  Summary In Wikipedia, classification is a guide to how to effectively classify Wikipedia articles. Classification is the process of classifying articles by subject. Guidelines exist for this course. Highly specific, accurate, and meaningful use of category names is recommended, and ambiguous use is prohibited The guidelines emphasize the importance of using existing categories and not creating unnecessary or redundant categories. It encourages editors to categorize articles based on notable aspects and relevance, while also considering future growth potential and changes in classification. It is also recommended that you create an article organization that is organized within a wider topic area using a category hierarchy. Emphasize the importance of consensus and collaboration among editors when making decisions about categorization, and encourage discussions to address arguments or concerns. It also provides recommendations for creating, maintaining, and managing categories, i...

  1. Summary There's a thing called the DYK project in Wikipedia. This sheds light on articles that have recently been created or expanded from existing articles. The project encourages contributors to produce high-quality documents by emphasizing high-quality articles. The main goal of this project is to produce high-quality documents. In addition to writing articles, this includes ensuring that articles meet certain criteria, such as policy compliance with Wikipedia. This article highlights the importance of hooks to encourage readers to read documents. To lead to interesting or notable articles, operators can propose multiple hooks and choose the most interesting hooks. There may be bad situations in which stimulating or incorrect methods are used in hook selection. Nevertheless, participating in DYK helps both the Wikipedia community and editors, and it is a project that contributes to Wikipedia's active activities. 2.Interesting The importance of hooks is emphasized in the...

  1. Summary Hybrid culture is used to describe mixed cultures, societies that allow and encourage the creation of new creations or derivatives by combining or editing existing materials. This culture, also known as literacy, represents the interrelationship between producers and consumers. Remixes have always been part of human culture, and remix cultures are gradually evolving in terms of technology, communication methods, and copyright ownership as the times change. In order for remix culture to survive, it must be shared and created by others. The producer is the consumer, the consumer is the producer. The social value of remixing activities in society is polarized. A few people praise the social value of remixing activities, while a majority think that intellectual property rights are influenced by other works. The meaning of copyright law is that many people are criticizing mixed cultures anymore. 2. Interesting points In order for a remix culture to survive, the process of s...

  1. Summary The Free Culture Movement is a social movement that promotes freedom to freely distribute and modify other people's creations. This is done through the Internet and other forms of media. The Free Culture Movement opposes excessive copyright law. Some people in the movement argue that these laws undermine creativity. They call these systems the "authorization culture." The free culture movement is consistent with the value of pursuing free exchange of ideas and with the free open source software movement. And organizations such as Creative Commons and Free Culture Students are promoting the movement. The Free Culture Movement is also being criticized by copyright advocates. Some people argue that free cultural ideas have a negative impact on the culture and arts industry. 2. Interesting/Useful Points The free culture movement began as a result of opposition to excessive copyright restrictions. The movement also claims that copyright laws undermine creativity a...

1. Summary Wikipedia has categories that can offer a wide range of disciplines. Wikimedia Commons is a website that stores and hosts all types of media files, including images, videos, and sounds, except text. Anyone can participate, and all content is licensed under a license that can be modified and redistributed. This makes this site a great resource for providing high-quality media files for personal projects. Wikipedia also provides instructions for the correct use of the different types of licenses and materials needed when you want to implement a project. 2. Interesting points It was amazing and interesting that Wikimedia Commons was able to use the site for free, despite providing high-quality materials. Being able to use good materials when you need them, it's very useful both in terms of learning and in terms of personal. This site is not a problem even in copyright disputes, so it is better to take advantage of its advantages. 3. Discussion Wikimedia Commons has many adv...