Reading 9. GeonwooLee

 1. SUMMARY

The term "free culture movement" means a movement that promotes free copyright and knowledge sharing. This refers to the ideology and movement to create an environment in which cultural creations and knowledge can be freely used, modified, shared, and redistributed.

The Wikipedia article describes the origins and concepts of the free culture movement, and deals with the free copyright model and its advantages. These movements explore ways to ease copyright restrictions or lift copyright restrictions in the areas of education, research, art, and culture. The Free Culture Movement aims to promote innovation and creativity through free copyright and knowledge sharing, and to promote broad access to knowledge and cultural diversity. This document helps us understand the principles and activities of these movements and explains the impact and importance of free cultural movements on culture and society.


2. INTERESTING POINT


In the field of knowledge sharing, copyright restrictions are memorable. It is thought that developing freely accessible resources at the educational level such as public libraries and digital archives is an important point. This will lead to a wider outcome. Of course, balanced guidelines should also be presented to prevent problems arising from indiscriminate reuse of resources.


3. DISCUSSION


Do you think that if indiscriminate redistribution and reuse of sources occurs on an educational level, it is unconditionally acceptable? What will happen if the results of education are commercially deteriorated?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more