Reading 7. Subin Jung

 1. Summary

There is a copyright culture in Wikipedia. Copyright is an important factor in any way. Anyone can become a creator by reworking existing media, which is democratic and builds culture. However, it can be added to the problem of copyright. There can be arguments in intellectual property rights and copyright laws.
Remix culture is a term that refers to the practice of recombining existing media to create new works, encompassing everything from music to literature, and technology is the driving force. Remix culture has been widespread mainly since the advent of digital technology and the Internet, and the concept of remix has a long history based on the period during which the culture flourished. One of the main characteristics of remix culture is that it obscures the line between creators and consumers. Despite this controversy, the remix culture is flourishing.


2. An interesting point.
It was interesting that anyone could become a creator if they reworked the media, but in this regard, they could be swept away by copyright issues.
Although we overlook the fact that we should be aware of copyrights that we do not know well, and that we should follow the rules and implement them, we were interested in the part that raised awareness about them.


3. Discussion

What's the extent of copyright that you think is when it comes to recreating the media, and what's the extent to which creativity is acceptable?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more