Reading 6. Subin Jung

 1. Summary

Wikipedia has the following characteristics. Explore culture and collaboration models and focus on Wikipedia community integrity and collaboration. There are books that can represent these characteristics. It's called "Good Face Collaboration," Joseph M. It's a book by Wriggle Jr. The book was published in 2010. The core of the book is that Wikipedia's success stems from "goodwill cooperation" among its contributors, namely cooperation through integrity and mutual respect. Wikipedia authors, volunteers explore the collaborative process, community norms and values with Wikipedia, and provide insights into community governance, conflict resolution, and collaboration. This insight positively enhances the collaborative culture with Wikipedia.


2. Interesting points
The evolution of Wikipedia, the sharing of knowledge and open culture reveal the complexity of tensions, power struggles, and collaboration within the Wikipedia community. Wikipedia has discussions about how to balance these overall interests, how to deal with editorial conflicts and controversies, and how to maintain integrity and an open environment. It was interesting to provide a reflective part of Wikipedia's dilemma for its community value.


3. Discussion
Wikipedia has a collaborative culture. Wikipedia emphasizes the importance of integrity and cooperation in building an open knowledge-sharing platform. Then, what competencies (rules, disciplines, etc.) do you think are the most important in the cooperation process for Wikipedia's integrity?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more