Reading 15

 As an AI language model, I don't have access to your personal experiences or activities, so I cannot provide specific information on what you may have learned while editing Wikipedia. However, I can provide a general perspective on the benefits and differences of editing Wikipedia compared to traditional student assignments.


While editing Wikipedia, you can potentially gain several valuable skills and knowledge, such as:


1. Research skills: Editing Wikipedia often involves conducting thorough research to gather accurate and reliable information to improve or create articles. This helps in developing critical evaluation skills and information literacy.


2. Writing and communication skills: Wikipedia requires clear, concise, and neutral writing to effectively communicate information to a wide audience. Editing articles helps in honing your writing skills and understanding how to present information in a balanced manner.


3. Collaboration and community engagement: Wikipedia is a collaborative platform where editors work together to improve articles. Participating in discussions, seeking consensus, and engaging with other editors can enhance your ability to collaborate and communicate effectively within a community.


4. Knowledge of reliable sources: Editing Wikipedia emphasizes the importance of using reliable and verifiable sources. This helps in understanding the value of credible information sources and evaluating the reliability of different types of references.


In terms of differences from traditional student assignments, editing Wikipedia provides a unique and interactive learning experience:


1. Real-world impact: When editing Wikipedia, your contributions are visible to a global audience and can be accessed by millions of people. Unlike traditional student assignments, which often have a limited audience, editing Wikipedia allows you to make a tangible impact on the accessibility and accuracy of information available to the public.


2. Continuous improvement: Wikipedia articles are ever-evolving, and editing allows you to contribute to the ongoing improvement of articles over time. This differs from traditional assignments that are typically submitted and graded once, as Wikipedia articles can be refined and expanded continuously.


3. Collaborative and open nature: Wikipedia is a collaborative platform where multiple users can contribute, review, and build upon each other's work. This fosters a sense of shared knowledge creation and promotes engagement with a diverse community of editors.


As for the question of whether editing Wikipedia is more fun, it largely depends on personal interests and preferences. Some individuals may find the collaborative and real-world impact aspects of editing Wikipedia exciting and enjoyable, while others may prefer the structure and feedback of traditional student assignments. Ultimately, the enjoyment factor may vary from person to person.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more