Reading 15. Woohyuck CHO

 I learned a lot while editing Wikipedia. First of all, I realized how important the reliability of the source of the article is. Wikipedia is working to provide reliable information to people all over the world. Therefore, you should always check the source and retrieve information from a trusted source during editing. Information from reliable sources, such as articles, journals, and books, helps to convey reliable knowledge to readers. This makes Wikipedia more reliable and meaningful information available.

 Wikipedia was the experience of discovering the surprises of collective intelligence. Wikipedia is a community where numerous contributors join together to share and develop knowledge. Various people contribute their knowledge and perspectives, creating rich content through discussion and cooperation. This collaboration process is also an exciting challenge. Improving content while sharing opinions and discussing with others has given me the opportunity to experience creative ideas and various perspectives.

 Wikipedia editing is different from traditional student assignments. In general, student assignments, it is common to study and write on a specific topic according to the instructions of an educator or professor. However, Wikipedia editing is done by the principle of collective intelligence, and is freely contributed by various people. This means that various perspectives and knowledge are fused to create rich content. Also, Wikipedia editing is a real-time collaboration, so the process of improving content while sharing opinions and discussing with others was more dynamic and interesting.

 I found that Wikipedia editing aims to provide readers with reliable knowledge as they experience the diversity and power of collaboration in the Wikipedia community. The process of placing importance on the reliability of the source of the article and developing content through collective intelligence has become an interesting and rewarding experience. It is very interesting to contribute to the world's largest online encyclopedia by editing Wikipedia, and to expand and interact with your knowledge through collaboration and discussion with others. It was interesting that these experiences provided opportunities for personal growth and knowledge sharing, and contributed to achieving Wikipedia's goals, and I will continue to try to be a good editor using Wikipedia.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more