Reading 14-WEI YUHAN

  --Summary

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia created and edited by users and operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia content can be created and edited by anyone, and almost all pages can be edited anonymously, which means that anyone can add, modify, or delete content on a page, thereby affecting the quality and reliability of Wikipedia's content. Wikipedia is a global project that includes nearly 300 language versions. This site is widely used and is known for its rich content, timely update speed and high quality articles.

--Discussion: Comparison of Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia

Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopaedia are two different online encyclopaedia websites, each with different characteristics and functions.

In terms of cross-language and information reliability, Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia are different in many ways. Wikipedia is very cross-lingual, not only covering people all over the world, but also covering a wide range of different areas of knowledge. However, the reliability of the information is not guaranteed because anyone can edit it, which makes some of the content likely to be wrong, inaccurate or biased. In contrast, the reliability of Baidu Encyclopedia's information is better guaranteed, but it only provides a Chinese version, so it is relatively weak in terms of cross-language.

In addition, the search function of Wikipedia and Baidu encyclopedia is also different. Wikipedia's search engine uses a full-text search algorithm that matches keywords as closely as possible in a short amount of time to return results that match the criteria. Baidu Encyclopedia's search engine uses a search algorithm based on keyword matching, which can screen out the most matched information. This means that while Baidu Encyclopedia is relatively easy to use, it is also more likely to mislead readers.

Based on the above analysis, we can see that the difference between Wikipedia and Baidu encyclopedia is very obvious. Wikipedia has the advantage of cross-language and wide coverage, but the reliability of information is uncertain; The advantage of Baidu Encyclopedia is the high reliability of information, but there are limitations in cross-language. Therefore, when choosing which encyclopedia to use, we need to consider our own needs and practical circumstances. If the pursuit of cross-language and more comprehensive knowledge, Wikipedia will be a better choice. If you consider the degree of trust and qualification, Baidu Encyclopedia is undoubtedly more reliable. In any case, we need to be careful about the content of online encyclopedias in order not to mislead our views.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more