Reading 13

 1. summary

The "Wikipedia:Did you know" page on Wikipedia provides information and guidelines for the "Did you know" (DYK) section, which showcases interesting and newly created or expanded articles on the Wikipedia main page. The DYK section aims to highlight lesser-known but noteworthy articles and attract readers' attention to them.


The page explains the purpose of the DYK section and how it serves as a platform for promoting new and interesting content on Wikipedia. It describes the process of selecting articles for the DYK section, which involves nominating and reviewing articles to ensure they meet the necessary criteria.


The DYK page provides guidelines for nominating articles and offers suggestions on how to write engaging and concise "hooks" - interesting facts or snippets that pique readers' curiosity. It also outlines the review process, where experienced editors assess the nominated articles and hooks for accuracy, neutrality, and compliance with Wikipedia's policies.


Furthermore, the page discusses the formatting requirements for DYK entries, including the inclusion of appropriate references and proper citation formatting. It provides instructions on how to submit nominations and participate in the review process.


Additionally, the DYK page emphasizes the collaborative nature of the DYK section, encouraging users to contribute by reviewing nominations, providing feedback, and suggesting improvements. It highlights the importance of community involvement in maintaining the quality and relevance of the DYK section.


In summary, the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page is a resource that outlines the purpose, guidelines, and process for featuring interesting articles on the Wikipedia main page through the DYK section. It provides information on how to nominate articles, write engaging hooks, and participate in the review process, while emphasizing the collaborative nature of the DYK section and the role of the community in its success.


2. interesting

One interesting point in the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page is the emphasis on highlighting newly created or expanded articles that may not receive as much attention otherwise. The DYK section serves as a platform to showcase these articles and draw readers' attention to them.


This aspect is interesting because it reflects Wikipedia's commitment to promoting a diverse range of content and giving recognition to editors who contribute to the creation and expansion of articles. The DYK section provides an opportunity for lesser-known articles to receive visibility and potentially attract more readership, thereby encouraging editors to continue developing high-quality content.


Furthermore, the page highlights the collaborative nature of the DYK section. It encourages users to actively participate in the nomination and review process, offering feedback, and suggesting improvements. This collaborative approach fosters engagement within the Wikipedia community and promotes a sense of shared ownership in maintaining the quality and relevance of the DYK section.


The inclusion of engaging and concise "hooks" to pique readers' curiosity is also interesting. These hooks aim to present interesting facts or snippets from the articles, enticing readers to click and explore further. It demonstrates the creative aspect of capturing readers' attention and encouraging them to delve into a wide range of topics covered on Wikipedia.


Overall, the focus on highlighting newly created or expanded articles, the collaborative nature of the DYK section, and the use of engaging hooks make the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page an interesting resource that contributes to the diversity and promotion of quality content on Wikipedia.


3. discussion

To discuss the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page on Wikipedia, you can follow these steps:


1. Visit the talk page: Locate the "Talk" or "Discussion" tab at the top of the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page and click on it. This will take you to the talk page associated with the article.


2. Start a new section: Scroll down to the bottom of the talk page and find the edit box. Create a new section by typing a concise and descriptive title for your discussion in double equals signs (== Title ==).


3. Compose your comment: In the edit box, write your comment or question related to the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page. Be clear, specific, and provide relevant arguments or examples to support your viewpoint. You can reference specific sections or statements from the article to provide context.


4. Sign your comment: At the end of your comment, add your signature. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically be converted into your username and the timestamp.


5. Preview and save: Before saving your comment, use the "Show preview" button to review how your comment will appear. Check for any errors or formatting issues. Once you are satisfied, click on the "Save page" button to publish your comment.


6. Engage in the discussion: Monitor the talk page for responses to your comment or other ongoing discussions related to the "Wikipedia:Did you know" page. Reply to other users' comments, offer counterarguments, or provide additional insights to contribute to the discussion.


Remember to maintain a respectful and constructive tone throughout the discussion. Focus on the content and improvement of the DYK section, provide well-reasoned arguments, and be open to considering different perspectives from other users.


Engaging in discussions on the talk page allows you to share your thoughts, ask questions, and contribute to the ongoing development and improvement of the DYK section on Wikipedia.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more