Reading 11 - Lee Seoyoon

 1. Summary

Wikipedia's DYK project sheds light on articles that have recently been created or expanded on existing articles. The project aims to encourage contributors to produce high-quality documents by highlighting high-quality articles. In addition to producing articles, this process includes verifying that articles meet certain criteria, such as complying with Wikipedia's policies. Articles that pass the validation are listed in the DYK section of Wikipedia Main. 

This article preaches the importance of hooks to encourage readers to read documents. The operator can propose multiple hooks and select the most interesting hooks. In other words, when listed in DYK, it introduces more readers and editors into the document, improving the accuracy of the article and promoting collaboration between editors. In other words, participating in DYK helps both the Wikipedia community and editors.

2.Interesting

DYK is listed on the main page of Wikipedia, increasing editors' desire to edit documents. This is thought to be related to editors' desire for fame. Due to the nature of Wikipedia developed by volunteers, it is natural for editors to operate an intangible reward structure, and it is surprising that Wikipedia maintains it at an excellent level.

3.Discussion

DYK is said to select interesting or noteworthy articles. Based on these selection criteria, there is a high possibility of an increase in stimulating elements of documents, how can they be controlled?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more