Reading 11. GeonwooLee

 1. SUMMARY

"Commons: FAQ" is a page with frequently asked questions about Wikimedia Commons. This page is designed to help first-time users of Wikimedia Commons and provides questions and answers about its key features and policies. The page consists of a variety of topics, including account creation and logins, file uploads, copyrights, licenses, categories, and searches. Each section provides frequently asked questions about the topic and a concise answer to them. This page allows users to find answers to questions and to use Wikimedia Commons more effectively. In addition, the page provides additional help and links to guidelines to help users gain more in-depth information. It is a useful collection of knowledge and experiences from the Wikimedia public community, helping users utilize and share media resources in a better way.


2. INTERESTING POINT


It is interesting that Wikimedia can find materials used to write articles on Wikipedia. Rather than searching on external sites, you can easily find answers through questions from people in a similar situation, and use Wikipedia more effectively. I think this is the charm of Wikipedia that allows people to share knowledge in groups and produce better results.


3. DISCUSSION


"Commons: FAQ" allows users to find answers through questions from people who have already experienced similar situations to their problem situations. This information must be found by the user himself, but can Wikipedia automatically inform the solution to the problem situation in situations where help is needed become a reality?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more