Reading 10. GeonwooLee

 1. SUMMARY

Remix culture means creating new results by combining, modifying, and reworking existing cultural materials. The realm of remix includes various genres such as music, graphic art, and GIF. For example, music remixing refers to rearranging existing songs into new forms or combining them with other songs to create new versions. Similarly, fan fiction refers to fans writing their own stories based on the characters or worldviews of the original novel or movie. The remix culture was further activated by the development of digital technology and the spread of the Internet. With digital editing tools and the Internet, people can easily import, modify, or combine existing materials. This allows artists to give new meaning by quoting or reinterpreting some of their other works when creating their creations. Remix culture plays a role in promoting creativity and collaboration. People create new works by bringing in existing materials and reinterpreting and combining them with their own ideas and styles. This not only enables individual creativity, but also allows artists and creators to reuse and collaborate with each other to create new creations.


2. INTERESTING POINT


It is always interesting to reprocess existing data to create new content. This action does not simply mix existing things, but creates new things. The most interesting thing is that remix culture presents new possibilities for creation and collaboration. Creativity is exhibited in the process of reinterpreting and combining existing cultural materials to create new works, and various artists and creators can collaborate on each other's works to jointly develop their creations. This is an interesting driving force in breaking the boundaries between art and culture, promoting collaboration and interaction, and drawing new forms of creation and cultural expression.


3. DISCUSSION


Remix culture clearly has the positive effect of creating something new. However, indiscriminate remixing can infringe on copyright and reduce the quality of creative results. Then, what are some guidelines to prepare for this?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more