Reading 1. GeonwooLee

 1. SUMMARY

Wikipedia is an Internet-based online encyclopedia, a resource that covers a variety of topics in the form of collaborative content creation and editing by users. Founded in 2001, Wikipedia aims to share and access information freely, and is a platform that allows users to participate in sharing and expanding knowledge. Specifically, Wikipedia is a representative platform that includes functions and concepts related to web editing. Web editing refers to the process by which users edit and modify Wikipedia's documents. Web editing on Wikipedia is done in a variety of ways. Some contributors work to modify or improve existing content, while others work to create new documents or expand documents that already exist. In this process, Wikipedia tracks modifications and improves the reliability and quality of content through reviews and feedback from other users. Web editing is an important factor in making Wikipedia an open and collaborative knowledge-sharing platform. This allows countless people around the world to contribute their knowledge and experience, and to increase Wikipedia's diversity and quality by providing various perspectives and information on topics.


2. INTERESTING POINT


Wikipedia's web editing itself is interesting. Web-based platforms have enabled many people to participate in editing without time and space constraints. Wikipedia offers a variety of languages and topics because many people can participate. Of course, as the number of people using it increased, we also provided various tasks for the reliability of the article. I think it's most interesting that various people can talk about various topics together in various languages.


3. DISCUSSION


Today, Wikipedia operates on a web-based online basis. Therefore, many people from all over the world can participate. But now, many people can communicate in other ways, not on the web. What is the most efficient means to run Wikipedia except for the web?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more