grading marker

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 2

 1. Summary This chapter discusses the history of attempts to create a universal encyclopedia, from Otlet's documentalists to Wikipedia. The author notes that failed projects and erroneous predictions still offer insight into the people and their time, and that the persistence of the vision of a universal encyclopedia throughout the twentieth century is revealing. The chapter also explores the reasons why it took so long for this vision to be realized, and suggests that the alignment of vision, pragmatics, and happenstance played a role. Despite the potential for reference works to be conservative, the author argues that a sentiment of global accord is often present, as exemplified by a preface to a 1956 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica. The author concludes by noting that a "good faith" culture is necessary for Wikipedia's production and can be an occasional consequence of participation. 2. Interesting The most interesting part of this article is that when indi...
Read more

Reading 2

 1. Summary Wikipedia is an open content community. As long as you have the identity of an open content community, open content provision and its accompanying core values automatically function as the core values of Wikipedia. These subvalues include transparency, integrity, non-discriminatory, and non-interference. But being open creates conditions that paradoxically threaten openness.  Anyone's ability to edit is a major factor in successfully building Wikipedia projects, but on the contrary, attempts to undermine Wikipedia also work on these systems. As a result, project managers often take limited action (for example, IP blocking). It also creates a closed private community that is ironic but differentiated from Wikipedia, an open project. Typically, there is a group of women who discuss gender bias-based editing within Wikipedia. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not the only problem with this gender bias. In early encyclopedias, women only had shorter references than men, and ...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more