W12Reading11 - LUAN QIANYUE

 1) Summary

The Wikipedia Commons FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) is designed to provide users with answers and explanations to frequently asked questions about Wikipedia Commons. FAQ's usually contain answers to frequently asked questions covering various aspects of Wikipedia Commons, such as uploading and using media files, copyright issues, editing rules, etc. . By reading the FAQ, users can get information on guidelines, strategies and best practices for using Wikipedia Commons, as well as solutions to some common problems.

2) Interesting point

Wikimedia Commons policies and guidelines provide a set of rules and guidelines for the media file repository to ensure high quality, legal and appropriate use of media content.

Uniform standards: The policies and guidelines provide a common set of standards and guidelines for the Wikipedia community to ensure that uploaded media files meet specific requirements and quality standards. Or community collaboration: These policies and guidelines encourage collaboration and interaction among community members to improve the quality and usability of media files through discussion and review processes. However, sometimes the interpretation and application of policies and guidelines can be controversial, as different users may have different interpretations and perspectives on particular regulations.

3) Discussion

 Wikipedia encourages cooperation and collaboration among community members to work together to improve entries. What is the role of discussion and how can it be used to coordinate editorial efforts and work together?

Comments

  1. caiyayuMay 15, 2023 at 1:09 AM

    Discussions play an important role in coordinating editorial efforts and fostering collaboration among members of the Wikipedia community. The discussion pages associated with each Wikipedia article provide a platform for users to communicate, exchange ideas and coordinate efforts to improve content.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 이서윤(Seoyoon Lee)May 15, 2023 at 2:29 AM

    Discussions work as a driving force for development. Through discussions, members consider better editing directions and make efforts to improve them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more