W11Reading10: - Remix culture - LUAN QIANYUE

 

1) Summary

Remix culture refers to the creation of new culture in the digital age, where people often create new cultural products and forms by combining and recombining different cultural elements through recombination, redesign and re-creation. This type of cultural creation is based on the convenience of digital technology and the openness of the Internet, which makes it easier for people to access, disseminate, share and create cultural products.

2) Interesting point

Remix culture can involve a variety of fields, including but not limited to

Music: Remix culture has become a popular form of music. By recombining and rearranging the original audio material, music with a new style and rhythm can be created.

Video: Remix culture video clips can create new video works with dramatic and emotional tension by reorganizing different video clips.

Literature: Remix culture literature often creates entirely new forms of literature by adopting and adapting other literary works, referencing pop culture vocabulary and icons, and so on.

At the same time, remix culture can also have negative effects, presenting artists with intellectual property challenges, such as how to protect their work from being copied or reproduced by others, and how to create and borrow from others without infringing on their rights.

3) Discussion

How to maintain originality and distinguish between "legal" and "illegal" creative acts in the creation of remix culture, which is often based on the recombination and adaptation of existing materials?

Comments

  1. XU RUOCIMay 12, 2023 at 11:54 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. XU RUOCIMay 12, 2023 at 11:55 PM

    I think remixing is not just by simply carrying it, but by adding your own ideas and your own creations. And it is important to get the permission of the original author first when creating.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more