Reading11---CAI YAYU

1.Summarize 

Wikimedia Commons is a free multimedia file repository designed to provide people around the world with access to share and use a variety of media resources. It is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation, similar to Wikipedia, but dedicated to storing and sharing various types of media files such as photos, illustrations, audio and video.

2. Interesting point

Wikimedia Commons uses a similar editing model to Wikipedia, allowing users to describe, categorise and tag files. This helps users to be able to easily search and find specific types of media files when they need them. In addition, Wikimedia Commons supports multiple file formats and offers a multilingual interface, making it a worldwide repository of media resources.

3. Discussion point

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Wikimedia Commons?

Comments

  1. LUANQIANYUEMay 15, 2023 at 1:09 AM

    Advantages of Wikimedia Commons:Vast Collection.Disadvantages of Wikimedia Commons:Complex Licensing: While the use of media files on Wikimedia Commons is generally straightforward due to the freely licensed nature

    ReplyDelete
  2. ZENG WANTINGMay 17, 2023 at 11:56 PM

    I think its advantages and disadvantages are large quantity but no guarantee of quality。

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more