Reading 8 - Lee Seoyoon

 1. Summary

Wikimedia Commons is a website that stores and hosts all types of media files, including images, videos, and sounds, except for text. Anyone can participate, and all content is licensed under a license that allows for modification and redistribution. Therefore, this site is a great resource for providing high-quality media files for personal projects. The FAQ page provides users with various information on how to upload files, search for content, and use advanced features on the site. At the same time, it also provides guidelines for using various types of licenses and materials correctly when using them in projects. In addition, it promotes the free exchange of information and ideas regardless of age or gender.

2. Interesting point

What's interesting is that it's a free site that uses or provides media files for commercial purposes. Within this site, individuals do not have to worry about getting involved in copyright disputes. In addition, Wikipedia's licensing policy is stronger than Wikipedia. Even if they are similar sites with the same purpose, we can see that not all points are the same.

3. Discussion

They argue that categories must be written in English for technical reasons. Why do you think English is recommended, unlike Wikipedia, which has various language specific versions?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more