Reading 11

 1. summary

The "Wikipedia:Article development" page on Wikipedia provides guidance and resources for users interested in contributing to the development and improvement of articles on the platform. It offers information and suggestions on how to create, expand, and refine articles effectively.


The page begins by emphasizing the importance of reliable sources and verifiability in Wikipedia articles. It encourages users to base their contributions on reputable sources and provides tips on how to locate and assess reliable information.


The article development page discusses the process of creating new articles, outlining the necessary steps, such as conducting research, organizing content, and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. It provides guidance on choosing article titles, creating an introductory section, and structuring the content using appropriate headings.


Furthermore, the page covers techniques for expanding existing articles. It suggests strategies such as adding more information, incorporating diverse perspectives, and including relevant citations to strengthen the article's content.


The article development page also addresses the importance of neutrality and avoiding bias in Wikipedia articles. It provides guidelines on maintaining a neutral point of view and ensuring that articles present information objectively.


Additionally, the page highlights the collaborative nature of Wikipedia and encourages users to seek input from others through the talk pages and community forums. It emphasizes the value of constructive feedback and the potential for collaboration to enhance article development.


In summary, the "Wikipedia:Article development" page serves as a resource for users interested in contributing to the improvement and creation of articles on Wikipedia. It provides guidance on sourcing, structuring, expanding, and maintaining neutrality in articles, while also emphasizing the collaborative nature of the platform.


2. interesting

One interesting point in the "Wikipedia:Article development" page is the emphasis on collaboration and community participation. Wikipedia is known for its collaborative nature, where users from around the world come together to create, expand, and refine articles.


The page encourages users to seek input and feedback from others through the talk pages and community forums. It highlights the value of diverse perspectives and the collective knowledge and expertise of the Wikipedia community in improving article quality.


This aspect is interesting because it showcases the power of collaboration in building a comprehensive and reliable knowledge base. By engaging in discussions, seeking input, and incorporating feedback, users can benefit from the collective wisdom and scrutiny of the community, resulting in more accurate and well-rounded articles.


The focus on collaboration also fosters a sense of shared ownership and responsibility for the articles. It promotes a culture of continuous improvement, where users are encouraged to contribute not only by creating new articles but also by refining and expanding existing ones.


Overall, the emphasis on collaboration and community participation in the "Wikipedia:Article development" page highlights the unique and dynamic nature of Wikipedia as a platform for collective knowledge creation and the role of users in shaping and enhancing its content.


3. discussion


To discuss the "Wikipedia:Article development" page on Wikipedia, you can follow these steps:


1. Go to the article's talk page: Locate the "Talk" or "Discussion" tab at the top of the "Wikipedia:Article development" page and click on it. This will take you to the talk page associated with the article.


2. Start a new section: Scroll down to the bottom of the talk page and find the edit box. Create a new section by typing a concise and descriptive title for your discussion in double equals signs (== Title ==).


3. Compose your comment: In the edit box, write your comment or question related to the "Wikipedia:Article development" page. Be clear, specific, and provide relevant arguments or examples to support your viewpoint. You may also reference specific sections or statements from the article to provide context.


4. Sign your comment: At the end of your comment, add your signature. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically be converted into your username and the timestamp.


5. Preview and save: Before saving your comment, use the "Show preview" button to review how your comment will appear. Check for any errors or formatting issues. Once you are satisfied, click on the "Save page" button to publish your comment.


6. Engage in the discussion: Keep an eye on the talk page for responses to your comment or other ongoing discussions related to the "Wikipedia:Article development" page. Reply to other users' comments, offer counterarguments, or provide additional insights to contribute to the discussion.


Remember to maintain a respectful and constructive tone throughout the discussion. Focus on the content and improvement of the article, provide well-reasoned arguments, and be open to considering different perspectives from other users.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more