Reading 10

 1. summary

The "Commons:FAQ" page on Wikimedia Commons provides answers to frequently asked questions about the Wikimedia Commons project, which is a repository of free media files that can be used by anyone.


The FAQ page begins by explaining the purpose of Wikimedia Commons as a platform for hosting media files, such as images, audio files, and videos, that are freely licensed and available for use by the public.


The page addresses common questions related to uploading files, including guidelines for selecting appropriate licenses, copyright considerations, and the types of files that can be uploaded. It also provides information on how to categorize and organize files effectively on the platform.


The FAQ page further discusses the importance of providing accurate information and proper attribution for uploaded files. It explains the concept of metadata and how to add descriptive information to media files to enhance their discoverability and usefulness.


Additionally, the page covers topics such as licensing, copyright infringement, and the process for resolving disputes related to media files. It provides guidance on how to report copyright violations and how the Wikimedia Commons community handles such reports.


Furthermore, the FAQ page touches on technical aspects, such as file formats, file size limitations, and recommended tools for editing and converting media files.


In summary, the "Commons:FAQ" page on Wikimedia Commons serves as a comprehensive resource for users who have questions about uploading, licensing, categorizing, and utilizing media files on the platform. It covers a wide range of topics related to the proper use and management of freely licensed media content.


2. interesting

One interesting point in the "Commons:FAQ" page on Wikimedia Commons is the emphasis on the importance of licensing and copyright considerations. The page provides detailed information on the various licensing options available for media files and encourages users to understand and comply with copyright laws.


This aspect is interesting because it highlights the commitment of Wikimedia Commons to promoting free and open access to media content while respecting copyright holders' rights. It underscores the platform's dedication to providing a repository of legally usable files that can be freely shared and reused by the public.


The FAQ page also addresses the process for reporting copyright violations and how the Wikimedia Commons community handles such issues. This demonstrates the platform's commitment to maintaining a robust and ethical content ecosystem by actively addressing and resolving copyright infringement concerns.


Overall, the emphasis on licensing, copyright compliance, and the management of intellectual property rights on Wikimedia Commons showcases the platform's dedication to fostering a responsible and lawful environment for sharing and utilizing media files.


3. discussion

To discuss the "Commons:FAQ" page on Wikimedia Commons, you can follow these steps:


1. Visit the discussion page: Open the "Commons:FAQ" page on Wikimedia Commons and locate the "Discussion" or "Talk" tab at the top of the page. Click on it to access the discussion page associated with the FAQ article.


2. Start a new section: Scroll down to the bottom of the discussion page and find the edit box. Create a new section by typing a concise and descriptive title for your discussion in double equals signs (== Title ==).


3. Compose your comment: In the edit box, write your comment or question related to the "Commons:FAQ" article. Be clear, specific, and provide relevant arguments or examples to support your viewpoint. You can reference specific sections or statements from the FAQ page to provide context.


4. Sign your comment: At the end of your comment, add your signature. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically be converted into your username and the timestamp.


5. Preview and save: Before saving your comment, use the "Show preview" button to review how your comment will appear. Check for any errors or formatting issues. Once you are satisfied, click on the "Save page" button to publish your comment.


6. Engage in the discussion: Monitor the discussion page for responses to your comment or other ongoing discussions related to the FAQ article. Reply to other users' comments, offer counterarguments, or provide additional insights to contribute to the discussion.


Remember to maintain a respectful and constructive tone throughout the discussion. Focus on the topic at hand, provide well-reasoned arguments, and be open to considering different perspectives from other users.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more