Reading 10: ZENG WANTING

 1）Summarize of metirals

Remix culture is a term to describe a society that allows and encourages the creation of new creative works or derivative works of products by combining or editing existing materials. By default, the remix culture will allow for improvements, changes, integration, or otherwise remixing of the work of the creator and copyright holder, with or without permission. While incorporating elements has been a common practice for artists in all fields throughout human history, the growth of proprietary copyright restrictions over the past few decades has been increasingly limited by law.

Creative Commons, which Lessig founded in 2001, released the Creative Commons license as a tool to enable remixing again, as the current default proprietary copyright regime for intellectual property legally prohibits remixing. The culture of mash-ups for cultural works is related to and inspired by the early software movement of free and open source software, which encourages reuse and mash-ups of software works

 

2）Something interseting I learned

The mash-up culture has no critics, but it has a serious problem with allegations of plagiarism.

 

3）My question

How should we try to avoid infringement？

Comments

  1. caiyayuMay 11, 2023 at 4:48 AM

    1. strengthen the regulation and management of social networks.
    2. enhance the knowledge of users.
    3. protect personal privacy and intellectual property rights.
    4. protect your rights through legal means.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more