Reading8：ZENGWANTING

1）Summary

The list of known historical hoaxes created on Wikipedia does not apply to hoaxes that are compelling in their own right and are not described as fact. The aim is to document hoaxes on Wikipedia to improve our understanding of them and our ability to detect them. The purpose of a hoax is defined as a clear and deliberate attempt to present false information as fact in a deceptive manner. Defamation and vandalism are not considered pranks. If a prank goes undetected for more than a month since it was created, it is considered sufficient to be included in this list. While the majority of scams on Wikipedia are short-lived (89% of scams discovered are flagged within an hour of creation, and only 1% of scams last more than a year), those that make it past the initial screening are more likely to continue to "survive" and remain on Wikipedia longer (if a scam survives beyond the first day, It has an 18% chance of lasting a year or more).

 

2）Something interested

This list is not complete because many hoaxes remain undiscovered. And compared to legitimate articles, successful hoaxes typically received less traffic per day, had a longer median article length (134 words versus 71 words), and contained fewer links to other Wikipedia articles given their article length.

 

3）Question

Will there ever be a more effective way for Wikipedia to find hoaxes and prevent them from passing scam?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading2：LI XINWEI

  1)  Summary    Wikipedia has a long history of development and it didn't happen overnight. Wikipedia couldn't have developed without all the people who had ideas to benefit the world. Wikipedia is free and does not exist for profit. As the internet grew and became more widely used, people began to plan and build interpedia. The "sum of all human knowledge" is the ultimate goal of Wikipedia, and the World Encyclopedia is the repository of knowledge to which all humanity aspires. The "necessary conditions" for the emergence of Wikipedia 2) Interesting point   “To collect all the knowledge now scattered over the surface of the earth, to make its general structure known to those around us, and to spread it to those who come after us.”   Regardless of their wealth, social status or academic background, people have the opportunity to participate in the editing of Wikipedia, sharing their experiences or knowledge to all people through this Wikipedia that covers ...
Read more

Summary of reading material 1----HE YUNONG (3.10)

  Summary of reading material 1 --HE YUNONG (하우농) 1. Summary After reading these articles, I learned more about Wikipedia. As mentioned in the article, no one would have imagined that Wikipedia could become the top website today. Before I took the course taught, I was also a person who had only heard of wiki but could not use or understand what Wikipedia was, including wiki voyage, wiki data, etc. Because I have never been taught, I am very grateful to the professor for letting me know about wiki and joining wiki. I understand that the core of wiki is a collaborative community, where many volunteers freely and voluntarily share their knowledge; Children as young as seven or eight years old and elderly people can become volunteers in wiki. One of the characteristics of wiki is that it is free and unpaid, so all wiki people don't work on wiki for money, but to love and help others. Wiki can develop into such a top-level website today without the efforts of these volunteers, and I thi...
Read more

Reading 14: ZENG WANTING

  1） Summarize of metirals Wikipedia has millions of editors, the population is larger than many counties. If we know about wikipedia cultures, we can know a new, complex, virtual culture can arise within barely a decade and it will improve our skills at editng wikipedia, reducing tensions and imrovinh ours familiarity with the project. When we editing the article of the wikipedia, we are contacting with other people we are not working alone. Wikipedia is a community, people work together and have communications with others. Wikipedia culture is significant enough th have impact on th real world. Wikipedia values related to th efree culture movement have influrenced legislation in the USA and elsewhere. Overall, Wikipedia's vibrant culture and the dedication of its community have played a significant role in creating a vast and reliable knowledge resource available to people worldwide. 2） Something interseting I learned The wikipeidia uesrs are called as wikipedian by their languag...
Read more