Reading7_Park Yeji

 [SUMMARY]

<Wikipedia:Reliable sources>-Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable public sources, and should include both the views of the majority and the significant few that appear in these sources. The corresponding Wikipedia article describes various types of reliability. If there is a contradiction between the guideline and the policy, the policy comes first and the editor should try to resolve the discrepancy. A source is where the material comes from. "The piece of work itself, the creator of the work, the publisher of the work" was specified as the type of sauce.

<Reliability of Wikipedia>-The reliability of Wikipedia is statistically tested through inherent advantages and disadvantages such as comparative review and pattern analysis. Wikipedia's credibility was frequently criticized in the 2000‘s, but improved over time, and was praised in the late 2010‘s and early 2020’s. The reliability criteria are “Accuracy of information provided within articles”, “Appropriateness of the images provided with the article”, “Appropriateness of the style and focus of the articles”, “Susceptibility to, and exclusion and removal of, false information”, “Comprehensiveness, scope and coverage within articles and in the range of articles”, “Identification of reputable third-party sources as citations”, “Verifiability of statements by respected sources”, “Stability of the articles”, “Susceptibility to editorial and systemic bias”, “Quality of writing”.


[INTERESTING POINT]

1. I knew how to use Wikipedia correctly by kindly explaining the concepts that should be mentioned when using sources. At the same time, it was interesting that unclear sources were censored and operated systematically in that they were limited.

2. It was amazing that Wikipedia also carries out fact-checking just like the media.


[DISCUSSION]

Wikipedia, like the press, conducts 'fact-checking' to verify the facts. Then, do you think Wikipedia should be viewed as a "similar press"?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more