Reading5——YE SIQI

1. Summary

Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia with a wide coverage, provides very detailed content for many professional terms and also provides many relevant references, making it easy to have a deeper understanding based on the cited content.In terms of data accuracy, the credibility of Wikipedia's references is high, but because everyone can edit them, it is necessary to think more when viewing references. I hope to pay more attention to the standardization of references.

Wikipedia is a comprehensive encyclopedia that represents the collection of human knowledge.An important principle of Wikipedia is neutrality and impartiality.We should express all voices fairly in the debate. Wikipedia is built on the basis of people's collaboration, and discussions should be conducted with goodwill when different disputes arise.


2.Interesting points

Compare Wikipedia to a globe.Like any other puzzle, these pieces must be combined, but in this case they form a globe, as seen near the top of the Wikipedia article. The hallmark of Wikipedia is an incomplete character world, where each character represents a different language.


3. Discussion points

How can we improve the accuracy of references for their standardization?

Comments

  1. YEJI PARKApril 6, 2023 at 4:13 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. YEJI PARKApril 6, 2023 at 4:15 AM

    I think it can be a more accurate reference if wiki participant write down the description on which page and part, not just the name of the article or the name of the paper.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CHENXINLEIApril 7, 2023 at 1:48 AM

    I think we should try to find the most up-to-date sources and express the objectives clearly so that we can filter out more high-quality references.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LI MINHUIApril 7, 2023 at 7:28 AM

    We believe that obtaining reliable sources is the first step in improving the accuracy of reference normalization. We can make good use of some tools websites to get reliable sources. For example, sites like Google Scholar, Google Books, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. XU RUOCIApril 7, 2023 at 7:38 AM

    I think you should choose more official references. And update them in real time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more