Wikipedia Edit Content 1

 1. I made a table showing the last subway and the first subway time on the 'Hanyang University at Ansan station' wikipedia. There are a total of two routes passing through the "Hanyang University at Ansan Station," and a table was inserted accordingly. Basically, when you insert a table, you get four lines by four lines. The table I need is 5 lines by 3 lines, so I deleted the rows with the arrows on the table and added columns. I also inserted a Wikipedia link into the name of the subway station. You can find out more about your edits from the links below.


2. I learned anew that the subway time on weekends and weekdays is different even if it is in the same direction. The table of important parts such as 'the first train time' and 'the last train time' is displayed in bold and visible. The "Hanyang University at Ansan Station" has two routes: Line 4 and Suin–Bundang line. When I wrote down the time for each direction of the two routes, it took a lot of time because I had to write down a total of eight times. I also found that hyperlinks can be inserted when inserting tables.


3. In the case of subway time, the subway time on weekends and weekdays is different, so I think we should edit the subway station carefully. Because we have to write down a lot of numbers, we can convey wrong information. If I ask you a question about editing, can I insert a color into the table? There is a table edited by someone else on top of my edit. In this table, 'line 4' is displayed in blue and 'Suin–Bundang line' is displayed in yellow, and I wonder how it can be displayed.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more