Reading&Summary 1 ---WANG HANPING

 Reading&Summary 1


1) Summary 

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so in order to prove the validity of the subject, a variety of articles and third-party sources must be cited.Before you start creating pages, Wikipedia warns you of this and points out that the subject of an article must be covered by a reliable source independent of the subject.Such resources include journals, books, newspapers, magazines, and reputations with empirical evidence.This quote will give credibility to what you post and convince the reader that it is true.

Wikipedia also facilitates the dissemination of social science knowledge, as well as dialogue among different social actors, fostering healthy social and communication habits, and emphasizing that inappropriate or incorrect information will be corrected in a timely manner.The encyclopedia platform also provides users with the opportunity to build personal information management skills and peripheral ideological sources to follow scientific advances.

As an open source, Wikipedia also focuses on the so-called imperfect principle of providing current topics or information, but without exaggeration or misrepresentation, most reference sources need to be accurate and authoritative. So from strictly rejecting unrealistic information.


2) Interesting points

I think it's interesting that when you post an article, a lot of people read it and make changes to it.Just as everyone sits together and talks about a thing, they make their own comments and modify it.The resulting content will be diversified and refined.


3) Discussion points

Because of Wikipedia's openness and arbitrary editing, when we see an article that is true, each person takes a different position and perspective, and views the article differently.What should you do if you disagree or think what this article says is unfair?

Comments

  1. ZHOU YUJIMarch 13, 2023 at 12:15 AM

    It's a very new comment, and it makes me wonder what Wikipedia really brings to people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more