Reading 14. GeonwooLee

 1. SUMMARY

Wikipedia's "Wikipedia: Did you know" is a section of Wikipedia that provides users with new or interesting information. This section, known as "DYK," is one of the items that appears on the main page of Wikipedia. The "DYK" section serves to highlight and draw attention to some content of new or modified documents created by users. This recognizes the contribution of the Wikipedia community and helps inform more users of new information. Users can propose items in the "DYK" section, which can be added to the queue after community review and approval. This gives users the opportunity to share and publicize their contributions with others. The "Wikipedia: Did you know" section has important features to help users explore and get to know new topics and topics in Wikipedia.


2. INTERESTING POINT


The most interesting thing is that Wikipedia shows certain articles to users first. DYK articles using quality article content and sources provide users with good information on various topics. In addition, the "Wikipedia: Did you know" section has elements that can arouse interest in different topics and different topics each time. Because items are randomly selected and changed periodically, users can explore new information and get to know various topics. This is one of the factors that can increase users' motivation to visit Wikipedia.


3. DISCUSSION


DYK articles are published on the main page, and there is a peculiarity that Wikipedia recommends articles to users first. The articles are posted after some review, so wouldn't it be possible for managers who review to collude with certain interest groups to post non-objective articles?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more