Reading9：LI XINWEI

1. Summary

The Free Culture Movement is a social and political movement that advocates the freedom to distribute and modify creative works through open-source software, and open access to academic literature, content, and data. The movement believes that access to and sharing of information should be free, collaborative and participatory. The Free Culture Movement has significantly impacted the development of digital technology and the Internet. It spurred the development of open-source software and the creation of collaborative communities, such as Wikipedia and the Open Access movement, which freely shared knowledge and information.

2. Interesting point

The Free art movement is different from the free Culture movement in that artists retain full copyright in their works. Free art is the practice of artists leaving works of art in public places for the public to take and keep. The artwork is usually marked with a statement stating that it is a free art and carries the artist's name or remains anonymous.

3. Discussion

The Free Culture movement can be applied to other areas as well？

Comments

  1. XU RUOCIMay 6, 2023 at 7:55 AM

    I think it can be applied to other areas though. But considering the issue of copyright, we can't implement free culture in all fields again. For example, the copyright of some books.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more