Reading10——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary

After reading this article, I understand that Remix culture is a term to describe society, which refers to the cultural phenomenon that people recreate and recreate existing cultural works through digital technology in the digital age; Encourage society to combine or edit existing materials to produce new creative works or derivative works. 

In general, remix culture allows the works of creators and copyright owners to be improved, changed, integrated or otherwise mixed, regardless of whether the copyright owners allow it or not.

Remix culture allows people to create and communicate more freely and flexibly, while promoting cultural diversity and innovation.

However, remix culture is also controversial. Some people think that remix culture may infringe the copyright and intellectual property rights of original works.

2. Interesting points

Interestingly, when describing that remix has always been a part of human culture, the author cited the idea of Professor Henry Jenkins, an American media scholar: "The story of American art in the 19th century can be told by mixing, matching and integrating folk traditions from different indigenous and immigrant populations."

3. Discussion points

Do you think remix culture should be promoted? Because it may infringe the copyright and intellectual property rights of original works.

Comments

  1. LI MINHUIMay 25, 2023 at 9:35 PM

    I think it can be advocated, which will make the culture more dynamic. But users need to communicate and create under the condition of understanding copyright restrictions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more