Reading10:CHEN XINLEI

Summary
Remix culture refers to a cultural phenomenon in which people recreate and recreate existing cultural works through digital technology in the digital age. These cultural works may be works in various forms such as music, film, art, and literature. The creators of these works can recombine, reorganize, mix, modify, etc. these works through digital technology to create brand new cultural works.

 The rise and development of Remix culture is driven by the technology of the digital age. People can easily acquire, use, process and share digital content through computer software, digital cameras, and the Internet. This allows people to carry out cultural creation and exchange more freely and flexibly, while also promoting cultural diversity and innovation.

 However, Remix culture has also sparked some controversy. Some people believe that in Remix culture, people's re-creation and modification of original cultural works may infringe the copyright and intellectual property rights of the original works. In addition, some people are also worried that Remix culture may lead to a decline in the quality of cultural creation, and the originality and uniqueness of cultural works will be diluted. Therefore, it is necessary to protect people's freedom and rights for cultural creation and innovation while maintaining cultural and creative property rights.

Interesting point

Ferguson described that, the three key elements of creativity — copy, transform, and combine — are the building blocks of all original ideas; building on Pablo Picasso's famous quote "Good artists copy, great artists steal."

Discussion

What are your thoughts on the potential copyright infringement crisis of remix culture?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more