Reading10 - 진심이 CHEN XINYI

 

1. Summary 

Mixed culture refers to the phenomenon of mutual integration and mutual influence between different cultures. In the era of globalization, as people's communication and movement become more frequent, the contact and communication between different cultures also become closer, which promotes the formation of mixed cultures. Overall, mixed culture is a complex phenomenon whose effects and consequences vary by region, history and social context. When dealing with mixed cultures, we should keep an open and inclusive mind, respect and learn the common ground and differences between different cultures, and promote dialogue and exchange to build a diverse and harmonious society.

2. Interesting point

People have different views on mixed culture. Some people worry that mixed cultures may lead to cultural homogenization and loss, where specific traditions and values may be ignored or watered down. In addition, mixed cultures may also trigger cultural conflicts and identity crises, because the differences between different cultures may lead to contradictions and disagreements. But I think mixed culture is a rich and diversified phenomenon, which can promote the innovation and development of culture. Through communication and integration between different cultures, people can be exposed to a wider range of ideas, values and art forms, thereby breaking down traditional boundaries and creating new ways of cultural expression. Mixed cultures can also promote mutual understanding and respect among people and help build a more inclusive and harmonious society.

3. Discussion

What do you think about mixed culture? Do you think mixed culture will lead to cultural loss?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more