Reading 6 - Lee Seoyoon

 1. Summary

The free culture movement is rooted in the belief that content should be freely available to everyone. This movement originated from the free software movement in the 1980s and expanded in the 1990s to apply the same principles to cultural content such as music and literature, in addition to software. The free culture movement is associated with the Creative Commons license, which provides a legal infrastructure for creators to share their work under more lenient conditions than traditional copyright law. Advocates of the free culture movement argue that copyright law suppresses creativity and innovation and benefits large corporations at the expense of artists, while critics argue that without copyright protection, the quality and diversity of creative works would decline.

2. Interesting point

Among the contents introduced in this document, Richard Stallman's copyright system is interesting. It was classified into works that could be used practically, works that represent perspectives, and works of art, among which there is a difference in perspective between him and me in that music is not practical.

3. Discussion

Do you think the copyright protection period granted by a copyright protection bill called the Mickey Mouse Protection Act is appropriate?






Comments

  1. CHENXINLEIMay 5, 2023 at 6:29 AM

    I think it's appropriate. So far, Mickey Mouse is still one of the most representative cartoon images of Disney. Along with popularity comes countless related benefits. In the face of such huge interests, in order to prevent the abuse of culture, I think it is necessary to use legal constraints.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more