Reading8-YE SIQI

1)  Summary

A Wikipedia prank list is a list of malicious editors and pranks that appear on Wikipedia.These pranks may involve false information, inaccurate information, misleading information, insulting information, etc. and may affect the reader's understanding of a subject or event.

Wikipedia's prank list is not an official page or category, but a list of known Wikipedia malicious editors and prank cases compiled from various sources (e.g., Internet forums, social media, etc.)Note that malicious editing and pranks are Wikipedia's problems, but they do not represent the accuracy or credibility of Wikipedia as a whole.Wikipedia is a platform edited and maintained by a wide range of volunteers. It provides a rich and useful source of information and has taken a number of measures to prevent and respond to malicious editing and pranks.We need to be vigilant about information on Wikipedia and take steps to verify its accuracy and credibility, such as viewing multiple sources, verifying the source and authority of information.


2)  Interesting point

Administrators contributed to the Wikipedia prank list.Administrators browse Wikipedia to detect and delete malicious edits and pranks, while recording and archiving this information for future viewing and reference.In addition, administrators can share this information with others to raise public awareness and understanding of malicious editing and pranks.

3) Discussion

How does the prank on Wikipedia affect Wikipedia's reputation and image?Will it affect the number and utilization of Wikipedia?

Comments

  1. I think Wikipedia hoax articles are usually very long because they deliberately fake wrong content into useful articles. Users need to spend a lot of time to read it, but they cannot get any help in hoax articles. If there are many such hoax articles, users' trust will be lost.If the reading experience is not good, it will also reduce the number of times users use it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Wikipedia's reputation comes from the fact that it uses open source, but the reliability of the article. However, if many people continue to write misinformed articles, Wikipedia's image will deteriorate. If you think Wikipedia doesn't guarantee reliability, users will gradually decrease.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading2:LI XINWEI

Summary of reading material 1----HE YUNONG (3.10)

Reading 14: ZENG WANTING