reading4:LI XINWEI

 1. summary

  Wikipedia is not anarchic, although it has the characteristics of anarchy. Wikipedia is not democratic, although it has the characteristics of a democracy. Wikipedia is not an aristocracy, although it has the characteristics of an aristocracy. Wikipedia is not a monarchy, although it has the characteristics of a monarchy.

 Only leaders who have acted prudently and continued to make important contributions can be given the title of 'dictator'. While this term may not best describe the true character of the role, it serves as a warning: a well-meaning joke balanced on the edge of becoming a frightening reality. It is a warning to such leaders and a metaphorical criterion for discussing the behaviour of any participant.


2. interesting points

  Appreciation of the community and its collaborative culture is key to understanding Wikipedia. However, unlike the purity of utopian dreams, Wikipedians must reconcile their vision with the inevitable social realities of exasperating personalities, philosophical differences and external threats. Despite a genuine culture of collaboration, an egalitarian spirit and openness - or because of it - Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership.

3. discussion points

  What are some of the most common challenges faced by the Wikipedia community in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of its content?


Comments

  1. Geonwoo Lee(이건우)June 16, 2023 at 2:05 AM

    Personally, I think the fundamental problem is that Wikipedia allows anyone to write articles on free topics. The lack of barriers to knowledge sharing is a really good advantage, but this should not be the starting point for lowering the quality of articles.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more