Reading 5

 1. Summary

What is the main metaphor used by the author to explain the culture of Wikipedia? The author uses the metaphor of a puzzle to explain the culture of Wikipedia. This metaphor is appropriate when thinking about H.G. Wells' vision of a "world brain" and the hope for a universal encyclopedia. The Wikipedia logo is that of an incomplete world of characters, each piece representing a different language. The metaphor of a jigsaw puzzle is also used to explain how the neutral point of view and good faith complement each other in the collaborative production of an encyclopedia. The author believes that good faith facilitates the process of fitting the pieces together with one's peers, sometimes frustrating and sometimes fun.

2. Interesting

There are several interesting points in this chapter:

  1. The metaphor of a jigsaw puzzle to explain how neutral point of view and good faith complement each other in the collaborative production of an encyclopedia.
  2. The hopeful and global aspiration of a universal encyclopedia and the motto of the Wikimania conference: "a Globe in Accord."
  3. The inherent tensions and practical difficulties within an open content community, such as the tyranny of structurelessness and Wikipedia office actions.
  4. The observation of Godwin's Law, which states that online interactions tend to devolve into parochial terms of "us versus them" and people tend to be less favorable in judging others than themselves.
  5. The idea that positive norms like "Don't Bite the Newcomers" or "Assume Good Faith" can dampen Godwin's Law and call upon "the better angels of our nature."
  6. The question of how a cooperative online effort like Wikipedia is possible and the focus on technology as an enabling factor.

3. Discussion

There are several topics that can be discussed based on this article. Here are a few suggestions:

  1. The impact of climate change on biodiversity: The article highlights the risk of extinction faced by several species due to the changing climate. This could lead to significant losses in biodiversity, which can have long-term consequences for ecosystems and human societies. A discussion can be had on the various ways in which climate change is affecting biodiversity and what measures can be taken to mitigate these impacts.

  2. The role of conservation efforts: The article mentions the conservation efforts being undertaken to protect the threatened species. A discussion can be had on the importance of such efforts and how they can be made more effective. This could involve talking about the different approaches to conservation, the challenges faced in implementing them, and the role of governments, NGOs, and individuals in this regard.

  3. The impact of human activities on the environment: The article highlights how human activities such as deforestation, habitat destruction, and pollution are contributing to the extinction risk faced by several species. A discussion can be had on the broader impact of human activities on the environment and the steps that can be taken to reduce this impact. This could involve talking about sustainable practices, the need for more responsible consumption and production patterns, and the role of policy in driving change.

  4. The ethics of species conservation: The article mentions the debate over whether or not certain species should be conserved. A discussion can be had on the ethical considerations involved in species conservation. This could involve talking about the value of biodiversity, the trade-offs involved in conservation efforts, and the broader ethical questions around human responsibility for the natural world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more