Reading 5--CAI YAYU

1)Summary 

Wikipedia's collaboration is one of the key factors in the site's success. Wikipedia is a multilingual online encyclopedia created and maintained by volunteer editors, which means that anyone can edit and update Wikipedia's content at any time and from anywhere.
Wikipedia's collaborative model is very open and flexible, allowing anyone to participate in editing, including anonymous users. To ensure the accuracy and credibility of content, Wikipedia has a number of editorial rules and guidelines, including verifying sources and following the principle of neutrality.
Wikipedia's collaboration also includes community building and management. The Wikipedia community is made up of volunteers who oversee the content and quality of Wikipedia and provide technical support, management and decision-making.
Wikipedia's collaborative model has proven to be very successful, making the site one of the largest online encyclopedias in the world and gaining widespread acclaim and recognition.

2)Interesting point

He likened Wikipedia to a planet. Humanity works together to achieve a win-win situation.

3)Discussion

Is there anywhere on the wiki where collaboration can be seen?

Comments

  1. 채효화April 5, 2023 at 12:49 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 채효화April 5, 2023 at 12:51 AM

    Wikipedia has many derivatives: "Wikipedia" is a multilingual dictionary with a wide range of applications, and is taking shape in collaboration with many volunteer editors.In the Wikibook project, many users can use their professional expertise to help produce school textbooks, such as Serbian History and Radiological Oncology.

    ReplyDelete
  3. LUANQIANYUEApril 6, 2023 at 9:40 PM

    Wikipedia's editors come from different countries and regions, with different backgrounds and knowledge. This diversity allows Wikipedia articles to cover a wide range of fields and topics. At the same time, these editors collaborate and communicate with each other to ensure the quality and accuracy of the articles.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more