Reading3——YE SIQI

1） Summary

Wikipedia is an open content community where everyone can express their own opinions, expand and explore common topics, and browse, create, and change wiki text.Wikis are a relatively novel way of working together: online, asynchronous, possibly anonymous, incremental, and cumulative.
The cooperative culture of a community is also an important factor in determining its future.Due to the autonomy, growth, and observable characteristics of wikis, wikis themselves have become an object of network research.People can discuss based on the emergence of their culture.On wikis, the regenerative, recursive, or dual nature of community policies and practices makes discussions on these issues very transparent, but this does not necessarily make them easy to filter and understand.Therefore, the research on wikis may enable people to have a deeper understanding of the network.

2）Interesting point

The information of multi person collaborative knowledge production is organized. Unlike traditional models that achieve information ordering through other organizations, the multi-person collaborative knowledge production model achieves information ordering through user collaboration and sharing in a self-organizing manner.Wikipedia not only continuously improves the content and level of the page, but also the entire hypertext organizational structure can be modified and evolved.At the same time, its content will gradually form convergence, and multiple pages with repetitive content within the system can be aggregated on one of them, and the corresponding link structure will also change.The idea of wikis is freedom, openness, cooperation, equality, and sharing. The most important foundation for collaboration is trust.The purpose of Wikipedia is to share knowledge with everyone and contribute to what they know and learn.The content in Wikipedia is a mixture of people's thoughts, which is the common result of the active participation of many people. At the same time, anyone who can use the Internet anywhere can unconditionally acquire the knowledge therein.Wikipedia adopts an open collaboration model, which enables individuals to gain overall intelligence by contributing their knowledge. This sharing and collaboration of information is the driving force behind the continuous evolution of Wikipedia.

3）Discussion

How to ensure the reliability and authority of knowledge content when generating and retaining a large amount of knowledge information?

Comments

  1. 채효화March 26, 2023 at 6:18 AM

    Wikipedia is constantly adjusting to ensure the accuracy and authority of its important entries and topics.One way to do this is to refer a particular entry to experts in the relevant field for examination and then freeze it so that others can no longer modify it at will to ensure the stability and authority of the entry.Moreover, more and more scholars are joining the Wikipedia writing team, which also guarantees the authority of Wikipedia entry articles.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more