Reading1——YE SIQI

                    Reading1——YE SIQI

1）Summary
 After reading the article, I got a new understanding of Wikipedia.As stated in the article, Wikipedia is now one of the top sites on the Internet, a multilingual encyclopedia-style collaborative project based on Wikipedia, written in many languages.Wikipedia has defined the best of different types of economic or community ethics: at its core is a "cooperative community" that freely and voluntarily sends out invitations to the world to understand and correct.It has more power than any democracy, and it inspires amateur morality than any entity.People from all over the world can edit Wikipedia in a language of their choice.There are also many volunteers who manage Wikipedia, and those who try to maintain it for their own love, they don't charge money.It is because of these people's efforts that Wikipedia has become a meaningful and enduring.

2）Interesting point
The founders of Wikipedia were willing to spend thousands of hours tweaking content to make it more accurate in the community, and the results were ultimately free.enough to see the humility of the founder.It says, "Every serious soul must try to understand this impossibility."Wikipedia has a lot to learn from, but it also has to be respectful.

3)Discussion point
Because Wikipedia can quickly organize information about recent events, and anyone can organize data in depth, many people have come to see Wikipedia as a source of news.But anyone can edit Wikipedia, how can they guarantee the accuracy of the information and objectivity of the presentation?

Comments

  1. LI MINHUIMarch 15, 2023 at 7:43 AM

    First of all, I agree with your point that Wikipedia has achieved long-term maintenance because of the love of volunteers. Secondly, I think that although anyone can write on Wikipedia, if there is no reliable source to support the published content, it will also be modified or deleted by administrators or other volunteers. So I think Wikipedia's content and information are still very trustworthy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 3——CHENXINLEI

  1）  Summary   This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's "openness" features. The author gives a detailed description of these five open characteristics.( Open content 、 Transparency 、 Integrity 、 Nondiscrimination 、 Noninterference) “ A central aspiration in the pursuit of a universal encyclopedia is increased access to information: an opening of opportunity and capability to anyone with a desire to learn. ” Open communities allow everyone to learn or express their thoughts on Wikipedia.Open knowledge community is not only an important gathering place for knowledge innovation and sharing, but also a source of wisdom.In such an environment, users are content sharers, creators, and providers of wisdom. “ people don’t even agree about which is which. ”   However, the malicious controversy brought about by such an environment cannot ignore a problem. Everyone's ideas are different, and it is because of the open environment that it is easier...
Read more

Reading 4

 1. Summary The article argues that understanding Wikipedia requires appreciating its community and collaborative culture, but also recognizing the challenges it faces from personal differences and external threats. Despite its collaborative nature, Wikipedia has been shaped by authorial leadership, with an informal benevolent dictator guiding the community and mediating disputes. However, this leadership role can be challenging to balance, as new responsibilities and authority may arise. The article uses examples, such as Sanger's reflections on his departure from the community and discussions about Wales's role, to illustrate the delicate balance of leadership in the Wikipedia community. 2. Interesting As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can identify some points that may be interesting to readers. One interesting point is how the author describes the culture and community of Wikipedia and how it has been shaped by authorial leadership. The idea of ...
Read more

Reading7——HE YUNONG

  1. Summary After reading this article, I understand that Wikipedia articles must have reliable sources, and the opinions in the sources should be neutral. Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 2. Interesting points News headlines—including subheadlines—are not a reliable source.  I think this is important because some news headlines are written to grab the reader's attention quickly and briefly; their news content may be exaggerated or lack context, and even sometimes contain sensational claims. 3. Discussion points Do you know how to test reliable sources?
Read more